Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Underweight Hospitalized Patients
Douglas Buckheit1, Amanda Lefemine2, Diana M Sobieraj1,3
1Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Insights
Reduced anticoagulant doses for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in underweight patients are common and linked to less major bleeding. This practice appears safe, with similar rates of other bleeding and VTE events compared to standard doses.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Internal Medicine
- Hematology
Background:
- Optimal anticoagulant dosing for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in underweight patients lacks robust evidence.
- Underweight patients present unique challenges for standard VTE prophylaxis regimens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize anticoagulant dosing strategies in underweight VTE prophylaxis.
- To compare bleeding and VTE incidence between standard and reduced anticoagulant doses in this population.
Main Methods:
- Multi-center retrospective study of medicine patients weighing ≤45 kg receiving VTE prophylaxis.
- Categorization into standard or reduced dose groups (unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin).
- Comparison of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and VTE incidence.
Main Results:
- 40.7% of 300 patients received a reduced dose, most commonly enoxaparin 30 mg daily.
- Standard dose was associated with significantly higher odds of major bleeding (OR 4.73).
- Incidence of non-major bleeding and VTE was similar between reduced and standard dose groups.
Conclusions:
- Reduced anticoagulant dosing for VTE prophylaxis in underweight hospitalized medicine patients is a frequent practice.
- Dose reduction is associated with decreased major bleeding events.
- Current reduced-dose strategies appear safe regarding other bleeding and VTE events.
Abstract:
There is limited evidence about optimal anticoagulant dosing for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in underweight patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize dosing strategies used in underweight patients and compare the incidence of bleeding and VTE to patients receiving a standard dose. This multi-center retrospective study evaluated medicine patients who weighed 45 kilograms or less and received VTE prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin. We categorized subjects into groups as either standard or reduced dose and compared the incidence of bleeding and VTE between groups. Of the 300 patients included in the outcome analysis, 40.7% received a reduced dose regimen, most often enoxaparin 30 mg daily. Standard dose was associated with major bleeding compared with reduced dose, when adjusted for age, gender and admission hemoglobin (odds ratio 4.73, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 21.34). Incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (2.4% vs. 1.1%) and VTE (0.6% vs. 0%) were similar between groups. Anticoagulant dose reduction for VTE prophylaxis in underweight hospitalized medicine patients is common practice and associated with less major bleeding.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

