Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
Published on: February 16, 2022
A predictive paradigm for COVID-19 prognosis based on the longitudinal measure of biomarkers
Xin Chen1, Wei Gao2, Jie Li3,4,5
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 211166.
Insights
This study introduces a novel machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 patient prognosis using longitudinal biomarker data. The method dynamically forecasts outcomes, improving early risk assessment for better treatment guidance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Biostatistics
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Predicting prognosis for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is crucial for guiding treatment.
- Previous risk prediction models often overlook disease progression and longitudinal biomarker changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a dynamic prediction model for individual COVID-19 patient prognosis.
- To identify key prognostic biomarkers and model their longitudinal trajectories.
Main Methods:
- Utilized historical regression trees (HTREEs) and joint modeling techniques.
- Modeled longitudinal trajectories of laboratory biomarkers in 1997 COVID-19 patients.
- Identified 14 important prognostic biomarkers in a discovery cohort.
Main Results:
- The joint model demonstrated strong performance in discriminating between survived and deceased patients (mean AUCs ranging from 84.81% to 95.78% across datasets).
- The predictive model was successfully validated in two independent datasets.
- Identified key biomarkers and characterized their time-to-event process.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully identified critical biomarkers for COVID-19 prognosis.
- A novel machine learning approach provides dynamic, individual-level predictions for COVID-19 outcomes.
- This method enhances early risk stratification and treatment guidance for COVID-19 patients.
Abstract:
Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging, rapidly evolving crisis, and the ability to predict prognosis for individual COVID-19 patient is important for guiding treatment. Laboratory examinations were repeatedly measured during hospitalization for COVID-19 patients, which provide the possibility for the individualized early prediction of prognosis. However, previous studies mainly focused on risk prediction based on laboratory measurements at one time point, ignoring disease progression and changes of biomarkers over time. By using historical regression trees (HTREEs), a novel machine learning method, and joint modeling technique, we modeled the longitudinal trajectories of laboratory biomarkers and made dynamically predictions on individual prognosis for 1997 COVID-19 patients. In the discovery phase, based on 358 COVID-19 patients admitted between 10 January and 18 February 2020 from Tongji Hospital, HTREE model identified a set of important variables including 14 prognostic biomarkers. With the trajectories of those biomarkers through 5-day, 10-day and 15-day, the joint model had a good performance in discriminating the survived and deceased COVID-19 patients (mean AUCs of 88.81, 84.81 and 85.62% for the discovery set). The predictive model was successfully validated in two independent datasets (mean AUCs of 87.61, 87.55 and 87.03% for validation the first dataset including 112 patients, 94.97, 95.78 and 94.63% for the second validation dataset including 1527 patients, respectively). In conclusion, our study identified important biomarkers associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 patients, characterized the time-to-event process and obtained dynamic predictions at the individual level.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Studies
Longitudinal Research
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

