Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025
Measuring DNA Damage and Repair in Mouse Splenocytes After Chronic In Vivo Exposure to Very Low Doses of Beta- and Gamma-Radiation
Published on: July 3, 2015
A comparison of the effect of X and gamma irradiation on red cell storage quality
Athinoula Meli1, Marie Anne Balanant1, Helen V New2,3
1Component Development Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK.
Background And Objectives:
Irradiation of red cell components is indicated for recipients at risk of transfusion-associated graft vs. host disease. Current technologies available comprise of a gamma (γ) or an x source of radiation. The benefits of x vs. γ include non-radioactivity and hence no decay of the source. We aimed to compare the effect of the two technologies on red cell component storage quality post-irradiation.
Materials And Methods:
Paired units of red cell concentrates (RCC), neonatal red cell splits (RCS), red cells for intra-uterine transfusion (IUT) or neonatal exchange transfusion (ExTx) were either γ- or x-irradiated. Units were sampled and tested for five storage parameters until the end of shelf life. Equivalence analysis of storage quality parameters was performed for pairs of the same components (RCC, RCS, IUT or ExTx) that were either γ- or x-irradiated.
Results:
Nearly all component comparisons studied showed equivalence between γ and x irradiation for haemolysis, ATP, 2,3-DPG, potassium release and lactate production. The exceptions found that were deemed non-equivalent were higher haemolysis with x irradiation for ExTx, lower 2,3-DPG with x irradiation for RCS irradiated early and higher ATP with x irradiation for IUT. However, these differences were considered not clinically significant.
Conclusion:
This study has demonstrated that a range of red cell components for use in different age groups are of acceptable quality following x irradiation, with only small differences deemed clinically insignificant in a few of the measured parameters.
