Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Children's developing capacity to calibrate the verbal testimony of others with observed evidence when inferring
Niamh McLoughlin1, Zoe Finiasz2, David M Sobel3
1School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK; Wheelock College of Education & Human Development, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract:
Across two studies (N = 120), we investigated the development of children's ability to calibrate the certainty of verbal testimony with observable data that varied in the degree of predictive causal accuracy. In Study 1, 4- and 5-year-olds heard a certain explanation or an uncertain explanation about deterministic causal relations. The 5-year-olds made more accurate causal inferences when the informant provided a certain and more calibrated explanation. In Study 2, children heard similar explanations about probabilistic relations, making the uncertain informant more calibrated. The 5-year-olds were more likely to infer the correct causal relations when the informant was uncertain, but only when the explanation was attuned to the stochasticity of the individual causal events (or outcomes that sometimes occur). These findings imply that the capacity to integrate, and make efficient inferences, from distinct sources of knowledge emerges during the preschool years.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Observational Learning
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

