Nutrient Composition of a Selection of Plant-Based Ground Beef Alternative Products Available in the United States
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas
Published on: February 10, 2018
Lisa Harnack1, Stephanie Mork2, Sruthi Valluri1
1Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Background:
Sales of plant-based foods intended as direct replacements for animal products have been growing in the United States. Little is known about the nutritional quality of these products.
Objective:
Our aim was to evaluate the nutritional quality of a selection of plant-based ground beef alternative products available in the US marketplace and compare it with the nutrient content of ground beef.
Design:
We conducted an analysis of the food and nutrient composition information available for plant-based ground beef alternative products in the 2020 version of the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center Food and Nutrient Database.
Participant/Setting:
We analyzed a selection of 37 plant-based ground beef alternative products available in the United States in 2019.
Main Outcomes Measures:
Food product content of energy, macronutrients, fatty acids, vitamins, minerals and selected additional food components was measured.
Statistical Analysis:
The percent Daily Value (DV) per 3-ounce cooked portion of each product was determined for nutrients with a DV. The median, interquartile range (IQR), minimum, and maximum nutrient values were calculated for all products by classification as vegan and nonvegan.
Results:
The median saturated fat content of the plant-based ground beef alternatives products as a %DV was 4% (IQR 2%). Vitamin and minerals for which median %DV values for plant-based ground beef alternative products were 10% or higher included folate (10%, IQR 10%), niacin (21%, IQR 7%), iron (10%, IQR 5%), phosphorous (10%, IQR 4%), sodium (18%, IQR 7%), manganese (20%, IQR 20%), and copper (24%, IQR 10%). The median dietary fiber content of the plant-based ground beef alternative products was 15% of the DV (IQR 6%). Most of the products contained less protein, zinc, and vitamin B12 than ground beef.
Conclusions:
The major brands of plant-based ground beef alternative products examined in this study have nutritional strengths as well as some shortcomings. Additional research to examine a broader set of plant-based meat alternative products, such as those designed as substitutes for chicken and pork, is warranted.
More Related Videos
07:19Quantifying Plant Soluble Protein and Digestible Carbohydrate Content, Using Corn Zea mays As an Exemplar
Published on: August 6, 2018
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Proteins: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Bioequivalence: Overview
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Protein Digestion
Bioavailability: Overview