Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.0K
A Zygomatic Bone Study Using Virtual Dental Implant Planning Software.
Sidnei Antonio Moro1, Geninho Thomé1, Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan1
1Latin American Institute for Dental Research and Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
The Journal of Oral Implantology
|June 6, 2021
Summary
Virtual planning using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) reveals anatomical factors influencing zygomatic implant success. Medium sinus concavity offers optimal apical anchorage, crucial for predictable zygomatic implant outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Radiology
Background:
- Zygomatic implants offer a solution for severe maxillary atrophy.
- Virtual planning is essential for optimizing zygomatic implant placement.
- Understanding anatomical variations is key to successful outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate anatomical factors influencing virtual planning of zygomatic implants.
- To correlate maxillo-sinus concavity with implant placement parameters.
- To assess the viability of the zygomatic bone for implant anchorage.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 268 cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans.
- Utilized specialized implant planning software for measurements.
- Assessed maxillo-sinus concavity, zygoma width, insertion angle, length, and apical anchorage.
Main Results:
- Medium-sized concavity (52.30%) was most frequent and showed greater apical anchorage (9.7 mm).
- Significant differences in angle, anchorage, and bone thickness were found across concavity types (P < .001).
- The most common implant length was 40 mm, with a mean insertion angle of 43.2 degrees.
Conclusions:
- The zygomatic bone is a viable site for zygomatic fixtures.
- Specialized planning software enhances predictability and visualization of zygomatic implants.
- Anatomical factors, particularly sinus concavity, significantly impact zygomatic implant planning and outcomes.

