Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Procedure and Key Optimization Strategies for an Automated Capillary Electrophoretic-based Immunoassay Method
Published on: September 10, 2017
Optimization of hemolysis, icterus and lipemia interference thresholds for 35 clinical chemistry assays
Clement K M Ho1,2, Claire Chen3, Johnson W S Setoh1
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Objectives:
Interference of chemistry assays by hemolysis, icterus and lipemia (HIL) was investigated on the Abbott Alinity c system. We sought to empirically establish optimized HIL index thresholds for the purposes of reporting HIL interference in a hospital laboratory and advising clinicians on the interpretation of laboratory results in the presence of hemolysis, icterus or lipemia.
Methods:
HIL index values measured by spectrophotometry were compared with concentrations of hemoglobin, bilirubin and Intralipid. HIL interference of 35 Abbott Alinity chemistry assays was subsequently investigated by pairwise comparison of test results in pooled serum or plasma with those in test preparations spiked with hemolysate, bilirubin or Intralipid. Data generated from the interference experiments were critically assessed according to assay-specific acceptance criteria adapted from multiple sources, and optimized thresholds for HIL indices were established.
Results:
Correlations between HIL index values and their corresponding concentrations of hemoglobin, bilirubin and Intralipid were, in general, very good within the ranges of interferent concentrations tested. Hemolysis significantly affected 12 of 35 assays, whereas bilirubin and Intralipid interfered with four and three assays, respectively. Both the direction and magnitude of Intralipid interference with the direct bilirubin assay were dependent on the concentrations of the analyte.
Conclusions:
HIL interference of the Abbott Alinity clinical chemistry assays investigated in this study was not uncommon. At present, there are no universally accepted criteria for defining significant assay interference for clinical practice. In establishing acceptance criteria for defining assay interference, each assay should be assessed according to both analytical criteria and clinical relevance.
More Related Videos
11:12Ex Vivo Red Blood Cell Hemolysis Assay for the Evaluation of pH-responsive Endosomolytic Agents for Cytosolic Delivery of Biomacromolecular Drugs
Published on: March 9, 2013
07:04Optimization of Antigen Preparation for Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay of Newcastle Disease Virus Serology
Published on: January 24, 2025