Data-Driven Modeling Approach for Pore Pressure Gradient Prediction while Drilling from Drilling Parameters
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
Published on: January 16, 2018
Ahmed Abdelaal1, Salaheldin Elkatatny1, Abdulazeez Abdulraheem1
1Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Real-time prediction of the formation pressure gradient is critical mainly for drilling operations. It can enhance the quality of decisions taken and the economics of drilling operations. The pressure while drilling tool can be used to provide pressure data while drilling, but the tool cost and its availability limit its usage in many wells. The available models in the literature for pressure gradient prediction are based on well logging or a combination of some drilling parameters and well logging. The well-logging data are not available for all wells in all sections in most wells. The objective of this paper is to use support vector machines, functional networks, and random forest (RF) to develop three models for real-time pore pressure gradient prediction using both mechanical and hydraulic drilling parameters. The used parameters are mud flow rate (Q), standpipe pressure, rate of penetration, and rotary speed (RS). A data set of 3239 field data points was used to develop the predictive models. A different data set unseen by the model was utilized for the validation of the proposed models. The three models predicted the pore pressure gradient with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.99 and 0.97 for training and testing, respectively. The root-mean-squared error (RMSE) ranged from 0.008 to 0.021 psi/ft for training and testing, respectively, between the predicted and the actual pore pressure data. Moreover, the average absolute percentage error (AAPE) ranged from 0.97% to 3.07% for training and testing, respectively. The RF model outperformed the other models by an R of 0.99 and RMSE of 0.01. The developed models were validated using another data set. The models predicted the pore pressure gradient for the validation data set with high accuracy (R of 0.99, RMSE around 0.01, and AAPE around 1.8%). This work shows the reliability of the developed models to predict the pressure gradient from both mechanical and hydraulic drilling parameters while drilling.
More Related Videos
12:18Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
10:18Dynamic Pore-scale Reservoir-condition Imaging of Reaction in Carbonates Using Synchrotron Fast Tomography
Published on: February 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Hydrostatic Pressure Force on a Curved Surface
Uniform Depth Channel Flow