Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

10:05
Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
8.5K
Optimal protamine dosing after cardiopulmonary bypass: The PRODOSE adaptive randomised controlled trial
Lachlan F Miles1,2, Christiana Burt3, Joseph Arrowsmith3
1Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Plos Medicine
|June 7, 2021
Summary
Protamine dosing guided by a mathematical model improved coagulation parameters after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and reduced protamine dose compared to fixed ratios. This approach optimized thromboelastography (TEG) results without increasing transfusion needs in low-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Protamine dosing post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) typically uses a fixed ratio based on pre-CPB heparin dose.
- Mathematical models of heparin clearance offer a potential method to improve protamine dosing precision and coagulation outcomes.
- This study investigated a 2-compartment model for protamine dosing versus a fixed ratio.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if protamine dosing based on a mathematical model improves thromboelastography (TEG) parameters compared to a fixed ratio.
- To determine if the model-based approach reduces the administered protamine dose.
- To assess the impact on postoperative outcomes such as transfusion requirements and drainage.
Main Methods:
- An adaptive randomized controlled trial (NCT03532594) with 228 participants was conducted.
- Participants were randomized to receive protamine dosed by a heparin clearance model or a fixed ratio (1 mg protamine/100 IU heparin).
- The primary endpoint was kaolin TEG r-time 3 minutes post-protamine administration; secondary endpoints included transfusion needs and drainage.
Main Results:
- The model-based group showed a significantly shorter mean kaolin TEG r-time post-CPB (6.58 vs. 8.08 minutes; p=0.0016).
- The post-protamine TEG more closely resembled pre-CPB parameters in the model group (ratio 0.96 vs. 0.75; p<0.001).
- The model group received a lower median protamine dose (180 vs. 280 mg; p<0.001) with no significant difference in transfusion or drainage.
Conclusions:
- Mathematical model-guided protamine dosing improves TEG parameters and reduces protamine dose compared to fixed ratios post-CPB.
- This approach did not increase postoperative drainage or red blood cell transfusion requirements in this low-risk cohort.
- Further research may explore generalizability to diverse patient populations and complex clinical scenarios.

