Error detection model developed using a multi-task convolutional neural network in patient-specific quality assurance
Yuto Kimura1,2, Noriyuki Kadoya1, Yohei Oku2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Medical Physics
|June 8, 2021
Summary
A deep learning model effectively detects single errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA), outperforming traditional gamma analysis for identifying specific machine errors in radiation therapy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) methods for dose analysis in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) QA can identify error sources.
- These ML methods have not been widely applied to volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) QA.
- Detecting errors in VMAT QA is crucial for patient safety and treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and evaluate a deep learning approach for detecting various errors in patient-specific VMAT QA.
- To develop a multi-task convolutional neural network (CNN) capable of individually identifying 12 distinct error types.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 161 prostate VMAT beams using a cylindrical detector (Delta4).
- Simulated 12 types of errors (MLC position, MU scaling, gantry rotation, phantom setup) and created 13 dose difference maps.
- Trained a multi-task CNN model on these maps and evaluated its performance against gamma analysis on two test datasets.
Main Results:
- The CNN model achieved higher accuracy than gamma analysis in classifying single-type errors on Test set 1 (0.92 vs. 0.81).
- On Test set 2, the CNN model's accuracy was 0.44, while gamma analysis with 2%/1mm criteria achieved 0.95.
- The model demonstrated superior performance in identifying individual error types compared to gamma analysis, though it was less effective with compound errors.
Conclusions:
- A multi-task CNN model was successfully developed for detecting errors in patient-specific VMAT QA.
- The developed model proved effective in identifying specific error types within VMAT QA dose maps.
- Further research may be needed to improve performance for compound errors.

