Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022
Corneal Endothelium: A Promising Quantitative Index for Graves Ophthalmopathy Activity Evaluation
Min Zhou1, Dide Wu2, Fenfen Yu1
1Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Purpose:
To investigate the corneal endothelium damage in Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) and its role as a promising quantitative index to evaluate GO activity.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Methods:
This study included 128 eyes of 64 patients with GO. All subjects underwent ophthalmologic examinations, including proptosis, tear break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein staining, and Schirmer test. Corneal endothelium was measured by noncontact specular microscope and ocular biometric parameters were measured by IOLMaster 700. Each eye was assigned a specific clinical activity score (CAS), then grouped as active (CAS ≥3 points) or inactive (CAS <3 points). Ocular parameters between the 2 groups were compared using generalized estimating equations accounting for inter-eye correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also obtained. Main outcome measures were parameters of corneal endothelium.
Results:
Among the included eyes, 81 eyes had inactive GO and 47 eyes had active GO. Corneal endothelial cell morphology was altered in active GO compared with inactive GO. The coefficient variation of cell area (CV) was significantly higher in active GO compared with inactive GO (37.0 [34.4-41.2]% vs 33.9 [30.9-36.8]%, P = .001), and positively correlated with CAS (r = 0.322, P < .001). Moreover, CV showed a diagnostic capacity to differentiate the active eyes from inactive eyes. The area under the ROC curve was 0.705.
Conclusions:
Active GO had morphologic changes in corneal endothelium compared with inactive GO. CV is a sensitive indicator to reflect corneal endothelial function, and has the potential to be adopted as a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative index for evaluating the activity status of GO patients.

