Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

777
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
777
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

2.4K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
2.4K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.5K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.1K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.1K
Beck's Cognitive Therapy01:25

Beck's Cognitive Therapy

152
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
152

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Individual and contextual effects of attention in risky choice.

Experimental economics·2025
Same journal

The role of self-confidence in teamwork: experimental evidence.

Experimental economics·2024
Same journal

Task completion without commitment.

Experimental economics·2024
Same journal

On the stability of norms and norm-following propensity: a cross-cultural panel study with adolescents.

Experimental economics·2024
Same journal

Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect.

Experimental economics·2023
Same journal

Editorial: Symposium "Pre-results review".

Experimental economics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K

Cognitive heterogeneity and complex belief elicitation.

Ingrid Burfurd1, Tom Wilkening2

  • 1Centre for Market Design, Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Experimental Economics
|June 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Stochastic Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (SBDM) mechanism is complex, showing greater belief error differences between participants with consistent and inconsistent probabilistic reasoning. Mechanism complexity and reasoning skills are key for interpreting elicited beliefs.

Keywords:
Belief elicitationCognitionComplexityObserver effectProbabilistic reasoning

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Theory
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The Stochastic Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (SBDM) mechanism is a theoretically sound method for eliciting incentive-compatible beliefs.
  • Concerns exist regarding the complexity of the SBDM mechanism and potential participant misunderstanding of its incentive properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how probabilistic reasoning skills and task complexity influence belief elicitation using the SBDM mechanism.
  • To compare the SBDM mechanism with Introspection regarding belief error variations.

Main Methods:

  • A two-part design was employed, first identifying participants based on probabilistic reasoning consistency using a stochastic dominance task.
  • Beliefs were elicited using the SBDM mechanism and Introspection in both easy and hard decision problems.
  • Fluid intelligence and cognitive effort were assessed using the Raven task and Cognitive Reflection Test, respectively.

Main Results:

  • The SBDM mechanism exhibited less variation in belief errors across problem difficulties compared to Introspection.
  • A larger discrepancy in belief errors was observed between participants with consistent and inconsistent probabilistic reasoning under the SBDM mechanism.
  • While cognitive abilities and effort predicted errors in both mechanisms, no significant interaction with elicitation method was found.

Conclusions:

  • The SBDM mechanism's complexity necessitates careful consideration, as it is more sensitive to individual differences in probabilistic reasoning.
  • Interpreting elicited beliefs requires accounting for both the chosen elicitation mechanism and the participants' underlying reasoning capabilities.