Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale

Özgür Önal1, Hande Nur Eroğlu1, Fatma Yağmur Evcil1

  • 1Department of Public Health, Süleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.

Insights

The Vaccine Hesitancy Scale was adapted for Turkish, proving valid and reliable for assessing vaccine hesitancy in the Turkish population. This 9-item, 2-factor scale aids in understanding parental vaccine attitudes.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Public Health
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Vaccine hesitancy is a global public health concern.
  • Understanding and measuring vaccine hesitancy is crucial for intervention development.
  • Existing scales may not be culturally appropriate for all populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale for the Turkish language.
  • To evaluate the validity and reliability of the adapted scale in a Turkish sample.
  • To provide a culturally relevant tool for measuring vaccine hesitancy in Turkey.

Main Methods:

  • Methodological study involving 317 participants (relatives of patients with children aged 9-16).
  • Data collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale.
  • Validity and reliability assessed using explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Main Results:

  • The adapted scale demonstrated strong validity and reliability.
  • Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin coefficient was 0.897; Bartlett's test was significant (P <0.001).
  • Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor structure, consistent with the original scale, with item factor loads ranging from 0.608 to 0.845. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.86.

Conclusions:

  • The adapted Vaccine Hesitancy Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for the Turkish population.
  • The scale consists of 9 items and 2 sub-dimensions.
  • This tool can be utilized to assess and address vaccine hesitancy in Turkey.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
531
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
401
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.2K
Behrens&#8211;Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
152
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
883