Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Reliability and reproducibility of sciatic nerve magnetization transfer imaging and T2 relaxometry
Fabian Preisner1, Rouven Behnisch2, Olivia Foesleitner1
1Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and T2 relaxometry are reliable for sciatic nerve MR neurography. These quantitative MRN biomarkers offer reproducible measurements, aiding future study interpretations and clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Neuroimaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Sciatic nerve MR neurography (MRN) is crucial for diagnosing peripheral nerve disorders.
- Quantitative imaging techniques like MTI and T2 relaxometry offer objective assessments.
- Reliability and reproducibility of these techniques are essential for clinical translation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interreader and test-retest reliability of MTI and T2 relaxometry for sciatic nerve imaging.
- To establish the reproducibility of quantitative biomarkers derived from these techniques.
- To provide reference values for measurement imprecision in sciatic nerve MRN.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 21 healthy volunteers.
- Standardized 3 Tesla MRN protocol including MTI and multi-echo T2 relaxometry sequences.
- Two independent readers assessed MTR, T2 relaxation time, and PSD.
- Interreader and test-retest reliability analyzed using ICCs and SEM.
Main Results:
- High interreader reliability (ICCs 0.81-0.94) and test-retest reliability (ICCs 0.75-0.94) were observed for MTR, T2, and PSD.
- Standard error of measurement (SEM) values were established for MTR (1.7%), T2 (2.66-2.67 ms), and PSD (20.1-21.3).
- Mean MTR: 26.75 ± 3.5%, T2: 64.54 ± 8.2 ms, PSD: 340.93 ± 78.8.
Conclusions:
- MTI and T2 relaxometry provide reliable and reproducible quantitative measures of the sciatic nerve.
- Reported SEM values serve as a guide for interpreting measurement imprecision.
- These findings support the use of quantitative MRN biomarkers in future research and clinical practice.
More Related Videos
12:14Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025
08:08An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery
Published on: May 11, 2011