Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

35.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
35.2K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

993
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
993
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.8K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.9K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.7K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.7K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.5K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.1K

Reevaluating Conscience Clauses.

Tiernan B Kane1

  • 1University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|June 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study challenges arguments against conscience protections in medicine. It argues these protections uphold moral integrity, which is essential for well-being and justifies their existence.

Keywords:
EmmanuelStahlconscienceconscientious objectionconsentintegritymedical ethicswell-being

More Related Videos

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia
06:50

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia

Published on: March 20, 2018

12.5K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.1K
Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia
06:50

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia

Published on: March 20, 2018

12.5K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law and Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Moral Philosophy

Background:

  • Recent arguments by Stahl and Emanuel challenge the necessity and scope of conscience protections in medical law and ethics.
  • These arguments raise concerns about potential conflicts between healthcare providers' moral beliefs and patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the arguments presented by Stahl and Emanuel against conscience protections.
  • To analyze the validity of claims regarding the impact of conscientious objection on patient well-being.
  • To establish the ethical and practical justification for conscience protections in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing literature and ethical arguments.
  • Examination of the nature and relevance of conscientious protection in military contexts.
  • Assessment of the scope of consent provided by contemporary medical professionals.

Main Results:

  • The arguments by Stahl and Emanuel misrepresent military conscientious protection and the scope of medical professional consent.
  • No evidence is presented to demonstrate that conscientious objection inherently harms patient well-being.
  • The fundamental benefit of conscience protections in promoting moral integrity is overlooked.

Conclusions:

  • Conscience protections are ethically justified as they safeguard moral integrity, a crucial component of human well-being.
  • The permissibility of conscientious objection should not solely depend on potential harm to patient well-being.
  • Medical law and ethics should continue to recognize and protect conscientious objection.