Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

8.6K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
8.6K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

3.8K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
3.8K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

15.5K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Degradable Vinyl-Based Polymers by Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization: A User Guide.

ACS polymers Au·2026
Same author

Clinical efficacy and safety of interventional embolization combined with early rehabilitation in the management of post-traumatic shoulder periarthritis.

BMC surgery·2026
Same author

Construction of a balanced scorecard-based performance evaluation indicator system for research management in key biomedical research laboratories: An observational study.

Medicine·2026
Same author

Catalyst Hide-and-Seek Beneath Porous Support Surfaces: Pinpointing Active Site Distribution Through Resonance Energy Transfer.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Influenza A virus membrane fusion is regulated by the balance between receptor binding and cleavage.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Species-specific chlorine resistance and biofilm regulation by extracellular polymeric substances and quorum sensing in drinking water pipeline bacteria.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening
10:50

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

11.1K

Genome editor-directed in vivo library diversification.

Cristina Cheng1, Mi Zhou1, Qiwen Su1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.

Cell Chemical Biology
|June 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Genome editors enable precise in vivo gene library diversification for biomolecular engineering. This approach enhances directed evolution by reducing toxicity and "cheater" mutations, improving sequence sampling for discovering novel biomolecules.

Keywords:
CRISPRbase editingdirected evolutionerror-prone polymerasegenome editingin vivo library diversificationrecombinasetargeted mutagenesistransposase

More Related Videos

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library
07:28

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library

Published on: January 10, 2025

481
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening
10:50

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

11.1K
Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library
07:28

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library

Published on: January 10, 2025

481
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomolecular engineering
  • Synthetic biology
  • Chemical biology

Background:

  • Directed evolution is a powerful tool for biomolecular engineering, requiring diverse gene libraries.
  • Efficient in vivo library diversification is crucial for sampling sequence space and identifying functional variants.
  • Traditional mutagenesis methods like whole-genome mutagenesis can cause toxicity and undesirable 'cheater' mutations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize recent advances in genome editor-directed in vivo library diversification.
  • To highlight the benefits of using genome editors for precise mutagenesis and library generation.
  • To provide an outlook on future applications in chemical biology.

Main Methods:

  • Exploiting genome editors for targeted and precise mutagenesis within living cells.
  • Facilitating in vivo library diversification focused on specific genes of interest.
  • Achieving higher mutational density compared to traditional methods.

Main Results:

  • Genome editor-directed diversification allows precise mutagenesis, focusing on desired genes.
  • This approach leads to higher mutational density within the gene library.
  • Occurrence of toxic effects and 'cheater' mutations is significantly reduced.

Conclusions:

  • Genome editor-directed in vivo library diversification represents a significant advancement in biomolecular engineering.
  • This technology offers enhanced precision, efficiency, and reduced negative outcomes compared to older methods.
  • Future applications in chemical biology are promising for accelerated discovery and development.