Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Published on: March 24, 2023
Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into
Elizabeth Houlding-Braunberger1,2,3, Jennifer Petkovic4,5, Nicholas Lebel2,6
1Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Objective:
Osteoarthritis generates substantial health and socioeconomic burden, which is particularly marked in marginalized groups. It is imperative that practitioners have ready access to summaries of evidence-based interventions for osteoarthritis that incorporate equity considerations. Summaries of systematic reviews can provide this. The present study surveyed experts to prioritize a selection ofinterventions, from which equity focused summaries will be generated. Specifically, the prioritized interventions will be developed into Cochrane Evidence4Equity (E4E) summaries.
Methods:
Twenty-seven systematic reviews of OA interventions were found. From these, twenty-nine non-surgical treatments for osteoarthritis were identified, based on statistically significant findings for desired outcome variables or adverse events. Key findings from these studies were summarised and provided to 9 experts in the field of osteoarthritis.. Expert participants were asked to rate interventions based on feasibility, health system effects, universality, impact on inequities, and priority for translation into equity based E4E summaries. Expert participants were also encouraged to make comments to provide context for each rating. Free text responses were coded inductively and grouped into subthemes and themes.
Results:
Expert participants rated the intervention home land-based exercise for knee OA highest for priority for translation into an E4E summaries, followed by the interventions individual land-based exercise for knee OA, class land-based exercise for knee OA, exercise for hand OA and land-based exercise for hip OA. Upon qualitative analysis of the expert participants' comments, fifteen subthemes were identified and grouped into three overall themes: (1) this intervention or an aspect of this intervention is unnecessary or unsafe; (2) this intervention or an aspect of this intervention may increase health inequities; and (3) experts noted difficulties completing rating exercise.
Conclusion:
The list of priority interventions and corresponding expert commentary generated information that will be used to direct and support knowledge translation efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation

