Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Immunotherapy in Treating EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer: Current Challenges and New Strategies
Kenneth K W To1, Winnie Fong1, William C S Cho2
1School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Abstract:
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have dramatically improved the survival and quality of life of a subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Multiple predictive biomarkers have been proposed to select the patients who may benefit from the immune checkpoint inhibitors. EGFR-mutant NSCLC is the most prevalent molecular subtype in Asian lung cancer patients. However, patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC show poor response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. While small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred initial treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, acquired drug resistance is severely limiting the long-term efficacy. However, there is currently no further effective treatment option for TKIs-refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. The reasons mediating the poor response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients to immunotherapy are not clear. Initial investigations revealed that EGFR-mutated NSCLC has lower PD-L1 expression and a low tumor mutational burden, thus leading to weak immunogenicity. Moreover, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade prior to or concurrent with osimertinib has been reported to increase the risk of pulmonary toxicity. Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in NSCLC patients can lead to hyperprogressive disease associated with dismal prognosis. However, it is difficult to predict the treatment toxicity. New biomarkers are urgently needed to predict response and toxicity associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recently, promising data have emerged to suggest the potentiation of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy by anti-angiogenic agents and a few other novel therapeutic agents. This article reviews the current investigations about the poor response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, and discusses the new strategies that may be adopted in the future.
Insights
EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients show poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. New biomarkers are needed to predict response and toxicity for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths globally.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have improved outcomes for some non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
- EGFR-mutant NSCLC, common in Asian populations, exhibits poor response to ICIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current research on the poor response of EGFR-mutant NSCLC to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
- To discuss potential reasons for this unresponsiveness, including low PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden.
- To explore novel therapeutic strategies and the need for predictive biomarkers.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies investigating EGFR-mutant NSCLC and immunotherapy response.
- Analysis of factors contributing to poor immunogenicity in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
- Examination of emerging therapeutic combinations and biomarker research.
Main Results:
- EGFR-mutant NSCLC demonstrates limited efficacy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy due to factors like low PD-L1 expression and low tumor mutational burden.
- Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) presents a challenge in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
- Concurrent use of ICIs with osimertinib may increase pulmonary toxicity risks and hyperprogressive disease.
Conclusions:
- EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients generally respond poorly to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
- There is an urgent need for biomarkers to predict response and toxicity in this patient group.
- Combination therapies involving anti-angiogenic agents and other novel therapeutics show promise for future treatment strategies.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...