Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

259
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
259
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

777
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
777
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

261
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
261

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Comment on: High N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Are Associated With Lower Physical Function Independent of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Shizuoka Study.

Geriatrics & gerontology international·2026
Same author

Effect of Self-Controlled Feedback on Motor Learning and Its Association with Metacognitive Ability.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

High N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Are Associated With Lower Physical Function Independent of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Shizuoka Study.

Geriatrics & gerontology international·2026
Same author

Usefulness of the bioimpedance phase angle in identifying older adults with poor muscle properties: The Shizuoka study.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2026
Same author

Relationship between Locomotive Syndrome and Cortical Bone Thickness and Trabecular Bone Density in a Community-dwelling Postmenopausal Population.

Physical therapy research·2026
Same author

Bioimpedance Analysis-Assessed Skeletal Muscle Mass Index Is Strongly Correlated With Computed Tomography-Measured Mid-Thigh Skeletal Muscle Cross-Sectional Area: The Shizuoka Study.

Geriatrics & gerontology international·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.7K

Does a Cognitive Task Promote Implicit or Explicit Motor Learning?

Takehide Kimura1, Wataru Nakano2

  • 1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

The N-back task may enhance explicit motor learning, but this study could not definitively confirm its effects on both implicit and explicit motor learning due to experimental limitations.

Keywords:
cognitive taskexplicit motor learningimplicit motor learningpromotion of motor learning

More Related Videos

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.5K
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

547.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.7K
Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.5K
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

547.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning Research

Background:

  • Implicit and explicit motor learning are crucial for skill acquisition.
  • The N-back task is a cognitive training tool with potential implications for motor learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the N-back task enhances implicit and explicit motor learning.
  • To address limitations in previous studies regarding awareness of task structures.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Healthy adults performed a serial reaction time task (SRTT) after N-back or control tasks; awareness of SRTT structure confounded results.
  • Experiment 2: Healthy adults performed a modified SRTT after N-back or control tasks, with retesting after one week.

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 results were inconclusive due to participants noticing a hidden loop in the SRTT.
  • Experiment 2 showed faster performance on the modified SRTT in the N-back group compared to the control group on both testing days.

Conclusions:

  • The N-back task may promote explicit motor learning.
  • Further research is needed to conclusively determine the N-back task's impact on both implicit and explicit motor learning.