Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
Published on: September 23, 2025
Definitions of Frailty in Qualitative Research: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Deborah A Lekan1, Susan K Collins1, Audai A Hayajneh2
1University of North Carolina at Greensboro, School of Nursing, Nursing and Instructional Building, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA.
Defining frailty in research is inconsistent, often relying on subjective assessments and older age, which may not accurately identify frail individuals. Clearer criteria are needed for valid qualitative research on lived experiences of frailty.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Qualitative Research Methodology
- Health Sciences
Background:
- Frailty is a complex, multidimensional construct impacting older adults.
- Understanding the lived experience of frailty requires clear participant selection criteria.
- Existing qualitative research on frailty lacks consistent definitions and operationalization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review how frailty is defined in qualitative research on community-living frail older adults.
- To examine conceptual and operational definitions used for participant inclusion.
- To identify inconsistencies and potential biases in frailty assessment within qualitative studies.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative systematic review of 25 studies from six electronic databases (1994-2019).
- Data extraction focused on frailty definitions within study aims, background, literature review, methods, and sampling.
- Content analysis and concept mapping used for data synthesis; quality appraisal assessed potential researcher bias.
Main Results:
- Frailty generally defined as a biopsychosocial construct with loss of resilience and vulnerability.
- Most studies used subjective assessments (age, physical impairments) for participant inclusion, with limited consistency in objective measures.
- 13 studies (52%) showed potential bias due to insufficient reporting on recruitment, sampling, and researcher-participant relationships.
Conclusions:
- Predominance of age and physical limitations as criteria questions participant frailty status.
- Lack of clear, standardized frailty criteria and reliance on subjective assessment risk bias and limit findings' validity and transferability.
- Standardized reporting of frailty definitions and assessment methods is crucial for future metasynthesis and clinical application.
More Related Videos
04:00Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
Published on: July 26, 2024
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Fatigue
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...