Emergency Department Access During COVID-19: Disparities in Utilization by Race/Ethnicity, Insurance, and Income
Jason Lowe1, Ian Brown1, Ram Duriseti1
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Insights
COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders reduced emergency department (ED) visits, disproportionately affecting Hispanic, lower-income, and Medicaid patients. Vulnerable populations need targeted outreach to prevent worsening healthcare disparities.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Healthcare Operations
- Health Disparities
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic prompted shelter-in-place orders in March 2020.
- Emergency departments (EDs) observed significant patient volume decreases, raising concerns about health equity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze changes in ED utilization patterns during COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders.
- To assess demographic shifts in ED visits, focusing on race/ethnicity, insurance, income, and acuity.
Main Methods:
- Electronic health records from a two-ED system were queried for March-June 2020 versus 2019.
- Weekly visit data were compared for absolute numbers and proportional changes.
- Statistical analysis (z-score) identified significant demographic and acuity differences.
Main Results:
- Overall ED volume decreased by 28%, with a nadir of 52% of 2019 levels.
- Proportions of Hispanic patients and Medicaid users decreased, while White patients and commercially insured patients increased.
- Visits from lower-income neighborhoods declined, while those from higher-income areas increased.
- A higher proportion of high-acuity (ESI level 1) patients presented, alongside increased admission rates.
Conclusions:
- Shelter-in-place orders altered ED utilization, with vulnerable populations (Hispanic, low-income, Medicaid) presenting less frequently.
- Hospitals must monitor demographic utilization patterns to address potential healthcare disparities.
- Targeted messaging is crucial to ensure vulnerable populations access emergency care during the pandemic.
Introduction:
In March 2020, shelter-in-place orders were enacted to attenuate the spread of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Emergency departments (EDs) experienced unexpected and dramatic decreases in patient volume, raising concerns about exacerbating health disparities.
Methods:
We queried our electronic health record to describe the overall change in visits to a two-ED healthcare system in Northern California from March-June 2020 compared to 2019. We compared weekly absolute numbers and proportional change in visits focusing on race/ethnicity, insurance, household income, and acuity. We calculated the z-score to identify whether there was a statistically significant difference in proportions between 2020 and 2019.
Results:
Overall ED volume declined 28% during the study period. The nadir of volume was 52% of 2019 levels and occurred five weeks after a shelter-in-place order was enacted. Patient demographics also shifted. By week 4 (April 5), the proportion of Hispanic patients decreased by 3.3 percentage points (pp) (P = 0.0053) compared to a 6.2 pp increase in White patients (P = 0.000005). The proportion of patients with commercial insurance increased by 11.6 pp, while Medicaid visits decreased by 9.5 pp (P < 0.00001) at the initiation of shelter-in-place orders. For patients from neighborhoods <300% federal poverty levels (FPL), visits were -3.8 pp (P = 0.000046) of baseline compared to +2.9 pp (P = 0.0044) for patients from ZIP codes at >400% FPL the week of the shelter-in-place order. Overall, 2020 evidenced a consistently elevated proportion of high-acuity Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level 1 patients compared to 2019. Increased acuity was also demonstrated by an increase in the admission rate, with a 10.8 pp increase from 2019. Although there was an increased proportion of high-acuity patients, the overall census was decreased.
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrate changing ED utilization patterns circa the shelter-in-place orders. Those from historically vulnerable populations such as Hispanics, those from lower socioeconomic areas, and Medicaid users presented at disproportionately lower rates and numbers than other groups. As the pandemic continues, hospitals should use operations data to monitor utilization patterns by demographic, in addition to clinical indicators. Messaging about availability of emergency care and other services should include vulnerable populations to avoid exacerbating healthcare disparities.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:29Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Standards of Care I
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
