Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Follow-up of the Cool Little Kids translational trial into middle childhood
Jordana K Bayer1,2,3, Amy Brown2, Luke A Prendergast4
1School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Insights
A parenting program for shy preschoolers did not show sustained benefits for internalizing problems in middle childhood. However, early intervention may reduce risks for children with anxious parents, highlighting the need for improved engagement strategies.
Area of Science:
- Child psychology
- Public health interventions
- Developmental psychopathology
Background:
- Internalizing problems (anxiety/depression) are a significant global health concern affecting up to 20% of school-aged children.
- These issues can negatively impact social relationships, academic performance, and long-term health outcomes.
- Early identification and intervention are crucial for mitigating these effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sustained effects of a selective parenting group program designed to prevent internalizing distress in inhibited preschoolers.
- To determine if the intervention's benefits persist into middle childhood.
- To explore the role of parental anxiety in the intervention's effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 545 parents of inhibited four-year-olds across 307 preschools in Melbourne, Australia.
- Intervention group received the 'Cool Little Kids' parenting program; control group received 'usual care'.
- Data collected annually on child anxiety/depression symptoms, anxiety disorders, parenting practices, and parent mental health from preschool entry to middle childhood.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in anxiety disorders, child anxiety/depression symptoms, parenting practices, or parent mental health between groups in middle childhood.
- Initial positive effects of the intervention on internalizing distress at school entry appeared to dissipate over time.
- A priori analyses indicated that early intervention attenuated the risk for internalizing problems in middle childhood for children with anxious parents.
Conclusions:
- The 'Cool Little Kids' parenting program's initial benefits for internalizing distress in shy preschoolers did not sustain into middle childhood, potentially due to low parent engagement.
- Future research should focus on identifying high-risk populations (combining temperamental inhibition and parental distress) and incorporating motivational strategies to enhance family engagement in preventive interventions.
Background:
Public health advocates have highlighted internalising problems as a leading cause of global burden of disease. Internalising problems (anxiety/depression) affect up to 20% of school-age children and can impact peer relations, school engagement and later employment and mortality. This translational trial aimed to determine whether a selective/indicated parenting group programme to prevent internalising distress in shy/inhibited preschool children had sustained effects in middle childhood. Translational design aspects were a brief parent-report screening tool for child inhibition offered universally across the population via preschools in the year before school, followed by an invitation to parents of all inhibited children to attend the parenting programme at venues in their local community.
Methods:
Design of the study was a randomised controlled trial. The setting was 307 preschool services across eight socioeconomically diverse government areas in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were 545 parents of inhibited four-year-old children of which 456 (84%) were retained during middle childhood (age of seven to 10 years). Early intervention was the Cool Little Kids parenting group programme, and control was 'usual care' access to available support services in the community. Primary outcomes were child anxiety and depression symptoms (parent and child report) and DSM-IV anxiety disorders (assessor masked). Secondary outcomes were parenting practices and parent mental health.
Results:
There was no significant difference in anxiety disorders between the intervention and control group during the three annual follow-ups of the cohort in middle childhood (2015 43% vs. 41%, 2016 40% vs. 36%, 2017 27% vs. 30%, respectively; p's > .05). There were also no significant differences in child anxiety or depression symptoms (by child or parent report), parenting practices or parent mental health, between the intervention and control group during middle childhood. However, a priori interaction tests suggested that for children with anxious parents, early intervention attenuated risk for middle childhood internalising problems.
Conclusions:
An issue for population translation is low levels of parent engagement in preventive interventions. Initial effects of the Cool Little Kids parenting group programme in reducing shy/inhibited preschool children's internalising distress at school entry dissipated over time, perhaps due to low engagement. Future translational research on early prevention of internalising problems could benefit from screening preschool children in the population at higher risk (combining temperamental inhibition and parent distress) and incorporating motivational techniques to facilitate family engagement. Trial registration ISRCTN30996662 http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN30996662.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies

