Hippocampal Volumes in Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Types Using Two Common Methods of MCI

Natalie A Emmert1, Katherine E Reiter2, Alissa Butts1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

Abstract

Insights

Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) shows significantly lower hippocampal volumes compared to non-amnestic MCI (naMCI). This finding holds true across different classification criteria, highlighting memory performance correlations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) encompasses various subtypes, with amnestic MCI (aMCI) often linked to hippocampal atrophy.
  • Different classification criteria for MCI can influence observed volumetric differences.
  • Automated volumetric software like Neuroreader™ is increasingly used, but its application to compare MCI subtypes requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate volumetric differences in hippocampal atrophy between aMCI and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI) using Neuroreader™.
  • To compare findings using two common MCI classification systems: Petersen/Winblad and Jak/Bondi.
  • To explore the correlation between memory performance and hippocampal volumes in MCI subtypes.

Main Methods:

  • Applied Petersen/Winblad and Jak/Bondi MCI criteria to 82 older adults.
  • Utilized Neuroreader™ software for automated brain MRI volumetric analysis.
  • Compared hippocampal volume z-scores between aMCI and naMCI groups.

Main Results:

  • Hippocampal volume z-scores were significantly lower in aMCI compared to naMCI, irrespective of the classification criteria used.
  • The aMCI group exhibited hippocampal volume z-scores significantly differing from the normative mean.
  • Positive correlations were observed between delayed recall measures and hippocampal z-scores in aMCI.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroanatomical changes in the hippocampus correlate with memory performance in MCI, supporting distinct neuropathological substrates for MCI subtypes.
  • Findings are consistent across two prevalent MCI classification systems.
  • Further research is warranted to establish the clinical utility of Neuroreader™ for analyzing hippocampal volumes in MCI.