Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
Early Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Inotropes - A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study in the Emergency
Amanda Harley1,2,3, Shane George1,3, Megan King3,4
1Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Insights
Early inotropes in pediatric septic shock may reduce fluid overload. The RESPOND ED pilot study assessed feasibility, aiming for less fluid resuscitation compared to standard care in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Critical Care
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Pediatric septic shock presents significant mortality and morbidity risks.
- High-volume fluid resuscitation, while standard, may cause harm.
- Evidence suggests a need for alternative early resuscitation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of early inotrope use in pediatric septic shock.
- To compare early inotrope administration versus standard fluid resuscitation.
- To assess if early inotropes reduce overall fluid bolus administration.
Main Methods:
- Open-label, randomized controlled pilot study (RESPOND ED).
- 40 children (28 days–18 years) with presumed septic shock randomized 1:1.
- Intervention: Early inotropes (adrenaline after 20 mL/kg fluid) vs. Standard: High-volume fluids (40-60 mL/kg) before inotropes.
Main Results:
- Feasibility outcomes are the primary focus.
- Secondary outcome: Survival free of organ dysfunction at 28 days.
- Long-term follow-up at 6 months for quality of life and functional status.
Conclusions:
- The RESPOND ED study protocol is designed to test a novel approach to pediatric septic shock resuscitation.
- Findings will inform future larger trials on optimizing fluid and inotrope strategies.
- Biobanking will support ancillary biomarker research.
Abstract:
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resuscitation with 40-60 mL/kg intravenous fluid boluses remains a cornerstone of initial resuscitation, an increasing body of evidence indicates potential for harm related to high volume fluid administration. We hypothesize that a protocol on early use of inotropes in children with septic shock is feasible and will lead to less fluid bolus use compared to standard fluid resuscitation. Here, we describe the protocol of the Early Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Inotropes - A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study in the Emergency Department (RESPOND ED). Methods and analysis: The RESPOND ED study is an open label randomised controlled, two arm, multicentre pilot study conducted at four specialised paediatric Emergency Departments. Forty children aged between 28 days and 18 years treated for presumed septic shock will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to early inotropes vs. standard fluid resuscitation. Early inotrope treatment is defined as the commencement of a continuous intravenous adrenaline infusion after 20 mL/kg fluid bolus resuscitation. Standard fluid resuscitation is defined as delivery of 40 to 60 mL/kg fluid bolus resuscitation prior to commencement of inotropes. In addition to feasibility outcomes, survival free of organ dysfunction censored at 28 days will be assessed as the main clinical outcome. The study cohort will be followed up at 28 days, and at 6 months post enrolment to assess quality of life and functional status. Biobanking nested in the study cohort will be performed to enable ancillary biomarker studies. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has ethical clearance (Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, HREC/18/QCHQ/49168) and is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000828123). Enrolment commenced on July 21st, 2019. The primary manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619000828123.

