Early Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Inotropes - A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study in the Emergency

Amanda Harley1,2,3, Shane George1,3, Megan King3,4

  • 1Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Insights

Early inotropes in pediatric septic shock may reduce fluid overload. The RESPOND ED pilot study assessed feasibility, aiming for less fluid resuscitation compared to standard care in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Pediatric septic shock presents significant mortality and morbidity risks.
  • High-volume fluid resuscitation, while standard, may cause harm.
  • Evidence suggests a need for alternative early resuscitation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of early inotrope use in pediatric septic shock.
  • To compare early inotrope administration versus standard fluid resuscitation.
  • To assess if early inotropes reduce overall fluid bolus administration.

Main Methods:

  • Open-label, randomized controlled pilot study (RESPOND ED).
  • 40 children (28 days–18 years) with presumed septic shock randomized 1:1.
  • Intervention: Early inotropes (adrenaline after 20 mL/kg fluid) vs. Standard: High-volume fluids (40-60 mL/kg) before inotropes.

Main Results:

  • Feasibility outcomes are the primary focus.
  • Secondary outcome: Survival free of organ dysfunction at 28 days.
  • Long-term follow-up at 6 months for quality of life and functional status.

Conclusions:

  • The RESPOND ED study protocol is designed to test a novel approach to pediatric septic shock resuscitation.
  • Findings will inform future larger trials on optimizing fluid and inotrope strategies.
  • Biobanking will support ancillary biomarker research.

Related Concept Videos