Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Postimplantation pocket hematoma increases risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A meta-analysis
Jakrin Kewcharoen1, Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan1, Sittinun Thangjui2
1University of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu HI USA.
Insights
Postimplantation pocket hematoma significantly elevates the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. Careful device implantation can help prevent hematoma and subsequent CIED infections.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- The relationship between postimplantation pocket hematoma and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection remains inconsistent in existing literature.
- Hematomas occurring after device implantation are a potential concern for infection development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis to clarify the effect of postimplantation hematoma on the risk of CIED infection.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted up to March 2020.
- Included studies encompassed cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and randomized controlled trials reporting on hematoma and CIED infection incidence.
- Data were synthesized using a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Main Results:
- The analysis included 14 studies with 28,319 participants.
- Postimplantation pocket hematoma was found to significantly increase the risk of overall CIED infection (OR = 6.30, 95% CI: 3.87-10.24).
- No significant publication bias or small-study effect was detected.
Conclusions:
- This meta-analysis confirms that postimplantation pocket hematoma is a significant risk factor for CIED infection.
- Implementing precautions during device implantation to minimize hematoma formation is crucial for preventing subsequent infections.
Introduction:
Several studies have shown an inconsistent relationship between postimplantation pocket hematoma and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of postimplantation hematoma and the risk of CIED infection.
Methods:
We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2020. Included studies were cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and randomized controlled trials that reported incidence of postimplantation pocket hematoma and CIED infection during the follow-up period. CIED infection was defined as either a device-related local or systemic infection. Data from each study were combined using the random effects, generic inverse variance method of Der Simonian and Laird to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
Fourteen studies were included in final analysis, involving a total of 28 319 participants. In random-effect model, we found that postimplantation pocket hematoma significantly increases the risk of overall CIED infection (OR = 6.30, 95% CI: 3.87-10.24, I 2 = 49.3%). There was no publication bias observed in the funnel plot as well as no small-study effect observed in Egger's test.
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that postimplantation pocket hematoma significantly increases the risk of CIED infection. Precaution should be taken during device implantation to reduce postimplantation hematoma and subsequent CIED infection.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction

