Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and radiological results of custom-made glenoid implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 36 months.

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty·2026
Same author

"Am I too old for a shoulder replacement?" The association between age and comorbidities on the outcomes following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Biomechanics of custom glenoid components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-a narrative review of concepts for surgeons.

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques·2026
Same author

Variation in reverse shoulder replacement surgery: A survey of UK shoulder surgeons.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same author

Osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, or total shoulder arthroplasty? : a qualitative study of surgeon decision-making.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Predictors of prolonged length of stay in shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.

Shoulder & elbow·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
07:22

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft

Published on: June 6, 2025

250

Measuring outcomes in rotator cuff disorders.

Aditya Prinja1, Sanjeeve Sabharwal1, Sebastian Moshtael2

  • 1Upper Limb Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
|June 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Outcome measures for rotator cuff disorders are evolving. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer valuable patient perspectives, but score heterogeneity complicates comparisons. This overview examines current rotator cuff outcome assessment methods.

Keywords:
Outcome scoresPROMSRotator cuffShoulder

More Related Videos

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.4K
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
07:22

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft

Published on: June 6, 2025

250
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.4K
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Rotator cuff disorder treatment outcomes have traditionally relied on surgeon-centric measures like clinical exams and imaging.
  • These objective measures often fail to capture the patient's subjective experience and perception of their condition.
  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have emerged to provide meaningful data on treatment effectiveness from the patient's viewpoint.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of the various outcome measures utilized in the assessment and treatment of rotator cuff disorders.
  • To highlight the evolution from surgeon-derived metrics to patient-centered assessments.
  • To discuss the diversity of PROMs and the challenges in comparing results across studies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of current research on outcome measures for rotator cuff disorders.
  • Categorization of outcome measures into general health, joint-specific, and disease-specific PROMs.
  • Inclusion of qualitative outcome measures to complement quantitative data.

Main Results:

  • A wide array of PROMs are currently in use for rotator cuff disorders, ranging from general health questionnaires to joint and disease-specific tools.
  • The heterogeneity in scoring systems across studies presents a significant challenge for direct comparison of treatment outcomes.
  • Qualitative outcome measures are increasingly recognized for their ability to provide context to quantitative findings.

Conclusions:

  • The field of rotator cuff outcome measurement has shifted towards patient-reported data to better reflect treatment success.
  • Standardization or clear reporting guidelines for PROMs are needed to facilitate meta-analysis and evidence synthesis.
  • A combination of quantitative PROMs and qualitative data offers the most holistic understanding of treatment outcomes in rotator cuff disorders.