Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
Published on: September 18, 2020
Why MUC16 mutations lead to a better prognosis: A study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric cancer cohort
Yu-Jie Huang1, Zhi-Fei Cao2, Jie Wang1
1Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Background:
MUC16, encoding cancer antigen 125, is a frequently mutated gene in gastric cancer. In addition, MUC16 mutations seem to result in a better prognosis in gastric cancer. However, the mechanisms that lead to a better prognosis by MUC16 mutations have not yet been clarified.
Aim:
To delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms that explain why MUC16 mutations signal a better prognosis in gastric cancer.
Methods:
We used multi-omics data, including mRNA, simple nucleotide variation, copy number variation and methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, to explore the relationship between MUC16 mutations and prognosis. Cox regression and random survival forest algorithms were applied to search for hub genes. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis and "EpiDISH" were used to assess immune cells infiltration, and "ESTIMATE" for analysis of the tumor microenvironment.
Results:
Our study found that compared to the wild-type group, the mutation group had a better prognosis. Additional analysis indicated that the MUC16 mutations appear to activate the DNA repair and p53 pathways to act as an anti-tumor agent. We also identified a key gene, NPY1R (neuropeptide Y receptor Y1), which was significantly more highly expressed in the MUC16 mutations group than in the MUC16 wild-type group. The high expression of NPY1R predicted a poorer prognosis, which was also confirmed in a separate Gene Expression Omnibus cohort. Further susceptibility analysis revealed that NPY1R might be a potential drug target for gastric cancer. Furthermore, in the analysis of the tumor microenvironment, we found that immune cells in the mutation group exhibited higher anti-tumor effects. In addition, the tumor mutation burden and cancer stem cells index were also higher in the mutation group than in the wild-type group.
Conclusion:
We speculated that the MUC16 mutations might activate the p53 pathway and DNA repair pathway: alternatively, the tumor microenvironment may be involved.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:23Abnormal Proliferation
01:20Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
03:03mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
01:12Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
02:07Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
01:33Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...