Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19
Mark Goldin1,2,3, Stephanie K Lin1, Nina Kohn2
1Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Insights
The IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model effectively identifies hospitalized COVID-19 patients at low, moderate, and high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This validation supports its use in guiding VTE prophylaxis strategies for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Internal Medicine
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiology
Background:
- Hospitalized COVID-19 patients face a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
- Accurate risk stratification is crucial for implementing effective VTE prophylaxis strategies.
- Existing risk assessment models require validation in specific patient populations, such as those with COVID-19.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the IMPROVE-DD VTE risk assessment model (RAM) in medical patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
- To assess the IMPROVE-DD RAM's ability to discriminate between different VTE risk levels in this population.
- To inform the clinical application of the IMPROVE-DD RAM for VTE prophylaxis in COVID-19 inpatients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 9407 adult COVID-19 inpatients across thirteen hospitals.
- Evaluation of the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM using established statistical methods, including ROC curve analysis and AUC calculation.
- VTE defined as new-onset symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
Main Results:
- A total of 274 patients (2.91%) developed VTE.
- VTE prevalence was 0.41% (low risk), 1.21% (moderate risk), and 5.30% (high risk) based on IMPROVE-DD scores.
- The IMPROVE-DD RAM demonstrated an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.703, indicating good discrimination.
Conclusions:
- The IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM is a validated tool for identifying hospitalized COVID-19 patients at varying risks of VTE.
- The model's discrimination performance suggests its utility in guiding VTE prophylaxis decisions.
- Further research may refine the model's application in diverse COVID-19 patient cohorts.
Abstract:
There is a need to discriminate which COVID-19 inpatients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) to inform prophylaxis strategies. The IMPROVE-DD VTE risk assessment model (RAM) has previously demonstrated good discrimination in non-COVID populations. We aimed to externally validate the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in medical patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to one of thirteen Northwell Health hospitals in the New York metropolitan area between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2020. VTE was defined as new-onset symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. To assess the predictive value of the RAM, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Of 9407 patients who met study criteria, 274 patients developed VTE with a prevalence of 2.91%. The VTE rate was 0.41% for IMPROVE-DD score 0-1 (low risk), 1.21% for score 2-3 (moderate risk), and 5.30% for score ≥ 4 (high risk). Approximately 45.7% of patients were classified as high VTE risk, 33.3% moderate risk, and 21.0% low risk. Discrimination of low versus moderate-high VTE risk demonstrated sensitivity 0.971, specificity 0.215, PPV 0.036, and NPV 0.996. ROC AUC was 0.703. In this external validation study, the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM demonstrated very good discrimination to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at low, moderate, and high VTE risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...

