Estimation of intramyocardial pressure and coronary blood flow distribution

To characterize the intramyocardial pressure (IMP) and coronary blood flow distribution in a stenosed coronary circulation, we compared four analog circuits for modeling coronary impedance. The resistor (R)-diode (D) model simulates vascular collapse, and the capacitor (C) simulates compliance effect. Identification of the best model and magnitudes of the endocardial and epicardial IMPs (IMPendo and IMPepi) was done retrospectively using data from studies in 28 anesthetized swine. Performance evaluation was based on comparison of model predicted vs. observed coronary distal pressure (DP) waveforms and endocardial-to-epicardial (endo-epi) flow ratios as determined by radiolabeled microspheres. The R-D-C model gave the best performance at IMPendo = 1.1 times left ventricular pressure (LVP), and IMPepi = 0.1.LVP + 15 mmHg; with good fit to DP (r = 0.98, slope of regression line = 1.0) and estimates of endo-epi flow ratio (r = 0.78, slope = 1.01, P less than 0.02, SEE = 0.21, n = 139). The R-D model gave comparable results even though capacitance was omitted. Although R-C and R models predicted distal coronary pressure well, they failed to predict endo-epi flow ratios (r less than 0.50). The R-D-C and R-D models were applied in seven prospective studies. Both models generated reasonable estimates of endo-epi flow distribution (r = 0.78, n = 50). Thus the R-D-C or R-D models of the stenosed coronary circulation can be used to provide reliable estimates of transmural blood flow distribution.