Is hybrid coronary revascularization really beneficial in the long term?
Chuan Wang1, Ping Li1, Fan Zhang1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) offers lower short-term risks than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Long-term outcomes for HCR and CABG are similar, making HCR a feasible option for multivessel coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide.
- Traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for severe CAD.
- Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines surgical and percutaneous interventions for revascularization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare short- and long-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- To evaluate different HCR techniques (simultaneous vs. staged) in comparison to CABG.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of HCR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 23 studies.
- Inclusion of 10,468 patients: 2403 undergoing HCR and 8065 undergoing CABG.
- Comparison of outcomes including mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and blood transfusion (BT).
Main Results:
- HCR demonstrated significantly lower risks of stroke, MACCE, and blood transfusion compared to CABG in the short term.
- Simultaneous HCR showed better outcomes for stroke and MACCE, while staged HCR was superior for BT.
- No significant long-term differences in survival or MACCE rates were observed between HCR and CABG.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is a feasible and effective treatment option for multivessel coronary artery disease.
- Short-term results favor HCR due to reduced adverse events, particularly stroke and MACCE.
- Long-term efficacy, including survival and freedom from MACCE, is comparable between HCR and traditional CABG.
Objectives:
This analysis aimed to compare both short- and long-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with different techniques and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods:
Twenty-three studies were included, covering 10 468 different patients, among whom 2403 patients underwent HCR with either simultaneous or staged method and 8065 patients underwent CABG.
Results:
Compared with CABG, HCR had a statistically significant lower risk of stroke [odds ratio (OR) = 0.55, P = 0.049], major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR = 0.69, P = 0.024) and blood transfusion (BT) (OR = 0.39, P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were detected in mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. A network meta-analysis showed that simultaneous HCR had significantly better outcomes in stroke (OR = 0.24, P = 0.01) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR = 0.29, P < 0.001), and staged HCR had a significantly better outcome in BT (OR = 0.31, P < 0.001). According to the frequentist statistic results, simultaneous HCR had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of mortality (84%), stroke (97%), myocardial infarction (88%) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (99%), whereas staged HCR had the highest probability of being the best in postoperative repeat revascularization (59%) and BT (83%). However, long-term results showed no significant difference between the HCR and CABG techniques.
Conclusions:
HCR appears to be a feasible option for multivessel coronary artery disease patients. Compared to traditional CABG, HCR had lower risk of adverse events in the short term, but in the long term, survival rate and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate were similar between groups.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy


