Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

07:08
Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets
Published on: February 2, 2024
1.1K
Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Based Pancreatic Cancer Screening in Patients With New-Onset Diabetes
Naomi R M Schwartz1, Lynn M Matrisian2, Eva E Shrader2
1CHOICE Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Summary
Risk-based pancreatic cancer (PAC) screening for patients with new-onset diabetes (NOD) is cost-effective if over 25% of detected cases are resectable. This strategy shows potential value for early PAC detection in high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Economics
- Radiology
Background:
- Pancreatic cancer (PAC) lacks established screening methods, but new-onset diabetes (NOD) patients are at elevated risk.
- National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) are exploring risk-based screening strategies for PAC in NOD patients.
- Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis can guide future data collection and trial design for PAC screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of CT screening for PAC in patients aged ≥50 years with NOD.
- To evaluate the potential value of risk-based PAC screening strategies.
Main Methods:
- An integrated decision tree and Markov model were used to compare CT screening versus no screening.
- Data on PAC prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and survival were sourced from the END-PAC study and SEER program.
- Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs were analyzed over a lifetime horizon with 3% discount rate.
Main Results:
- Base case: screening yielded 0.0045 QALYs and $293 additional cost per patient, with a cost per QALY gained of $65,076.
- Probabilistic analysis: cost per QALY gained was <$50,000 in 34% and <$100,000 in 99% of simulations.
- Threshold analysis: over 25% of screen-detected PAC cases must be resectable for screening to be cost-effective (<$100,000 per QALY gained).
Conclusions:
- Risk-based PAC screening in NOD patients is likely cost-effective in the US if a modest fraction (>25%) of screen-detected PAC cases are resectable.
- Further evaluation is recommended once clinical trial data from initiatives like the PanCAN Early Detection Initiative become available.

