Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Can existing electronic medical records be used to quantify cardiovascular risk at point of care?
Harry Klimis1,2, Tim Shaw1,3, Amy Von Huben1
1Westmead Applied Research Centre and Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
Electronic health records lack data for cardiovascular risk assessment. Improving data capture is crucial for better cardiovascular disease prevention and management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Informatics
- Public Health
Background:
- Electronic data utilization for cardiovascular risk stratification offers potential for prioritizing healthcare access and optimizing prevention strategies.
- Accurate cardiovascular risk assessment is essential for effective patient management and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of calculating the Australian absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) and the History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) score using data from Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and My Health Record (MHR).
- To assess the completeness of patient data within EMR and MHR for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients presenting with acute cardiac symptoms.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective audit of EMR and MHR data was conducted for 200 adult patients presenting to a Rapid Access Cardiology Clinic (RACC).
- The study assessed the proportion of patients for whom ACVDR and HEART scores could be calculated based on available electronic data.
- Data completeness for key variables required for both risk scores was analyzed.
Main Results:
- An ACVDR score could be estimated for only 17.5% of patients using EMR data and 0% using MHR data.
- Complete data to calculate the HEART score was unavailable for all patients in both EMR and MHR.
- Commonly missing data for ACVDR included blood pressure and HDL cholesterol; for HEART score, missing data included BMI and comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- Significant deficiencies exist in the electronic capture of critical variables necessary for comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment.
- Prioritizing the collection of clinically relevant data in electronic medical systems is imperative to bridge gaps in cardiovascular care and management.
- Enhancing data quality in EMR and MHR is vital for accurate risk stratification and personalized cardiovascular prevention.
Background:
Using electronic data for cardiovascular risk stratification could help in prioritising healthcare access and optimise cardiovascular prevention.
Aims:
To determine whether assessment of absolute cardiovascular risk (Australian absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR)) and short-term ischaemic risk (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) score) is possible from available data in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and My Health Record (MHR) of patients presenting with acute cardiac symptoms to a Rapid Access Cardiology Clinic (RACC).
Methods:
Audit of EMR and MHR on 200 randomly selected adults who presented to RACC between 1 March 2017 and 4 February 2020. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients for which ACVDR score and HEART score could be calculated.
Results:
Mean age was 55.2 ± 17.8 years and 43% were female. Most (85%) were referred from emergency for chest pain (52%). Forty-six percent had hypertension, 35% obesity, 20% diabetes mellitus, 17% ischaemic heart disease and 18% were current smokers. There was no significant difference in MHR accessibility with age, gender and number of comorbidities. An ACVDR score could be estimated for 17.5% (EMR) and 0% (MHR) of patients. None had complete data to estimate HEART score in either EMR or MHR. Most commonly missing variables for ACVDR score were blood pressure (MHR) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (EMR), and for HEART score the missing variables were body mass index and comorbidities (MHR and EMR).
Conclusions:
Significant gaps are apparent in electronic medical data capture of key variables to perform cardiovascular risk assessment. Medical data capture should prioritise the collection of clinically important data to help address gaps in cardiovascular management.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

