Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
'Rollover' abdominal paracentesis versus standard technique: protocol of a crossover randomized comparative trial
Vishal Sharma1, Daya Krishna Jha1, Manish Rohilla2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
A new rollover technique may improve the detection of cancer cells in peritoneal fluid (ascites) compared to standard abdominal paracentesis. This study aimed to enhance diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Diagnostic Cytopathology
Background:
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnosis relies on detecting malignant cells in ascites.
- Standard abdominal paracentesis sensitivity for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis ranges from 40-70%.
- Tumor cells preferentially accumulate in specific peritoneal recesses, potentially affecting diagnostic yield.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic yield of a novel rollover paracentesis technique against the standard method.
- To assess cytological positivity for tumor cells in patients suspected of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the rollover technique in improving cancer cell detection.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover study design was employed.
- Each patient served as their own control.
- A blinded cytopathologist assessed cytological yield from both standard and rollover paracentesis techniques.
Main Results:
- The study aimed to compare tumor cell positivity between the standard and rollover paracentesis groups.
- Primary objective was to determine if the rollover technique increases cancer cell detection rates.
- Cytological yield was assessed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each method.
Conclusions:
- The rollover technique shows potential for improving the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
- Further analysis is needed to confirm if this technique enhances cytological yield compared to standard paracentesis.
- This comparative study provides insights into optimizing ascites fluid analysis for cancer diagnosis.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
03:53Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs