Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.3K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

7.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

13.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
13.9K
Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

408
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
408

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive event-triggered dissipative filtering for interval type-2 fuzzy semi-Markov jump systems with quantization and sensor failures.

ISA transactions·2025
Same author

Dissipative constraint-based multi-area power system with time-varying delays and cyber-attacks.

ISA transactions·2025
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Spectroscopic Single Molecule Localization Microscopy.

Small methods·2024
Same author

Nanoscale single-vesicle analysis: High-throughput approaches through AI-enhanced super-resolution image analysis.

Biosensors & bioelectronics·2024
Same author

Analysis of medical images super-resolution via a wavelet pyramid recursive neural network constrained by wavelet energy entropy.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2024
Same author

Investigation of out-of-distribution detection across various models and training methodologies.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.2K

How to handle noisy labels for robust learning from uncertainty.

Daehyun Ji1, Dokwan Oh1, Yoonsuk Hyun2

  • 1Samsung Advanced Institute Of Technology, Samsung Electronics, Suwon, 16678, South Korea.

Neural Networks : the Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society
|June 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces Uncertain Aware Co-Training (UACT), a novel method for training deep neural networks (DNNs) with noisy labels. UACT improves model robustness and generalization by leveraging label uncertainty, outperforming existing techniques.

Keywords:
Deep networkNoisy labelsRobust learningUncertain aware joint training

More Related Videos

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.8K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.2K
Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.8K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Deep Learning
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Deep neural networks (DNNs) often encounter performance degradation when trained with large amounts of noisy labels due to the memorization effect and overfitting.
  • Existing methods primarily rely on small loss tricks to address robust training challenges with noisy labels.
  • The relationship between network uncertainty and label cleanliness is crucial for improving training stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between uncertainties and clean labels in deep neural network training.
  • To develop a novel robust training method that utilizes both small loss tricks and uncertainty-based label selection.
  • To enhance the generalization performance of DNNs trained with extremely noisy labels.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced Uncertain Aware Co-Training (UACT), a new training methodology.
  • UACT incorporates a small loss trick alongside a mechanism to select potentially clean labels based on network uncertainty.
  • The method leverages inherent network uncertainty to guide the learning process.

Main Results:

  • UACT effectively avoids overfitting DNNs even with highly noisy labels.
  • The proposed method achieves strong generalization performance by utilizing acquired network uncertainty.
  • Experimental results on benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, T-ImageNet, News) demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • Uncertain Aware Co-Training (UACT) offers a robust solution for training deep neural networks with noisy labels.
  • By effectively utilizing label uncertainty, UACT improves model generalization and mitigates overfitting.
  • The proposed technique represents a significant advancement in handling noisy data in deep learning applications.