Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
538
[Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise]
Jan Löhler1, Mathias Sippel2, Leif Erik Walther3
1HNO-Praxis, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie
|June 22, 2021
Summary
This study found weak correlations between speech tests and the APHAB questionnaire in hearing aid fitting success. Results suggest these measures complement each other, with individual hearing loss compensation influencing outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Hearing Science
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Hearing aid fitting (HAF) success is commonly measured using questionnaires like the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and speech-audiometry tests.
- The Freiburg monosyllabic word test (FBE) and its noise-included version (FBE-S) are speech-audiometry tools used in HAF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlations between speech-audiometry results (FBE, FBE-S) and APHAB outcomes before and after HAF.
- To assess the relationship between specific APHAB subscales (ease of communication, background noise, reverberation) and HAF benefit.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 156 subjects undergoing HAF, including FBE, FBE-S, and APHAB measurements.
- Application of Spearman's correlation and Cohen's effect size after data normality exclusion.
Main Results:
- No significant correlations were found between APHAB subscales (EC, RV, ECBNRV) and HAF benefit measured by FBE and FBE-S.
- Most correlation coefficients exhibited weak positive effect sizes.
- A moderate positive effect size was observed in only six combinations, primarily for the EC subscale.
Conclusions:
- The weak effect sizes suggest that speech-audiometry and APHAB results are not independent but rather complementary in assessing hearing loss and HAF benefit.
- Individual differences in hearing loss compensation capabilities may explain the observed effect sizes.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
4.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
4.5K
Behrens–Fisher Test
151
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
This test...
151
Bonferroni Test
2.9K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.9K

