Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer
Sheng Ao1,2, Yuchen Wang1, Qingzhi Song1
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Abstract:
Gastric cancer, with high morbidity and mortality rates, is one of the most heterogeneous tumors. Radical gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy are the standard treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) need to be confirmed by many trials before implementation, creating a bottleneck in development. Although clinical benefits of NAT have been observed, a series of problems remain to be solved. Before therapy, more contributing factors should be offered for choice in the intended population and ideal regimens. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning is usually applied to evaluate effectiveness according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), yet CT scanning results sometimes differ from pathological responses. After NAT, the appropriate time for surgery is still empirically defined. Our review aims to discuss the abovementioned issues regarding NAT for GC, including indications, selection of regimens, lesion assessment and NAT-surgery interval time.
Insights
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) shows promise for gastric cancer (GC) but requires further research on patient selection, regimen choice, and optimal timing for surgery. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving NAT
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease with high mortality.
- Standard treatment involves radical gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy.
- Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) shows potential but faces implementation challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current issues and challenges in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.
- To discuss optimal patient selection, regimen choice, and assessment methods for NAT in GC.
- To explore the appropriate timing for surgery after NAT for GC.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.
- Analysis of current challenges in NAT implementation, including patient selection and regimen efficacy.
- Discussion of imaging techniques (e.g., enhanced CT) and pathological response assessment.
- Review of factors influencing the NAT-surgery interval.
Main Results:
- Clinical benefits of NAT for GC are observed but require further validation.
- Current methods for evaluating NAT effectiveness (e.g., RECIST via CT) may not perfectly correlate with pathological responses.
- Optimal criteria for patient selection, ideal regimens, and the timing of surgery post-NAT remain areas needing clarification.
Conclusions:
- Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric cancer (GC) requires optimization regarding patient selection and treatment regimens.
- Accurate assessment of treatment response and determination of the optimal surgical timing are critical for successful NAT implementation.
- Further clinical trials are needed to establish definitive guidelines for NAT in GC management.
More Related Videos
10:31Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Published on: August 9, 2016
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists