Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
Robot technology in dentistry, part two of a systematic review: an overview of initiatives
Tom C T van Riet1, Kevin T H Chin Jen Sem2, Jean-Pierre T F Ho3
1Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering (3ME), Dept. of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
To provide dental practitioners and researchers with a comprehensive and transparent evidence-based overview of physical robot initiatives in all fields of dentistry.
Data:
Articles published since 1985 concerning primary data on physical robot technology in dentistry were selected. Characteristics of the papers were extracted such as the respective field of dentistry, year of publication as well as a description of its usage.
Sources:
Bibliographic databases PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. A hand search through reference lists of all included articles was performed.
Study Selection:
The search timeline was between January 1985 and October 2020. All types of scientific literature in all languages were included concerning fields of dentistry ranging from student training to implantology. Robot technology solely for the purpose of research and maxillofacial surgery were excluded. In total, 94 articles were included in this systematic review.
Conclusions:
This study provides a systematic overview of initiatives using robot technology in dentistry since its very beginning. While there were many interesting robot initiatives reported, the overall quality of the literature, in terms of clinical validation, is low. Scientific evidence regarding the benefits, results and cost-efficiency of commercially available robotic solutions in dentistry is lacking. The rise in availability of open source control systems, compliant robot systems and the design of dentistry-specific robot technology might facilitate the process of technological development in the near future. The authors are confident that robotics will provide useful solutions in the future but, strongly, encourage an evidence-based approach when adapting to new (robot) technology.
