Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Preterm EEG: A Multimodal Neurophysiological Protocol
Published on: February 18, 2012
Anna Madeline Kidman1,2, Brett James Manley3,2,4, Rosemarie Anne Boland3,4
1Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia akidman@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Insights
Higher nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may reduce reintubation rates in extremely preterm infants. This trial compares higher CPAP pressures against standard pressures to assess extubation failure risk.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Respiratory distress syndrome is a major complication in extremely preterm infants, often necessitating mechanical ventilation.
- Mechanical ventilation can lead to lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, prompting early extubation attempts.
- Extubation failure, requiring reintubation, affects approximately 60% of extremely preterm infants, highlighting the need for optimized non-invasive support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of higher nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) pressures in reducing extubation failure in extremely preterm infants.
- To compare the rate of reintubation within 7 days when using CPAP pressures of 9-11 cm H2O versus 6-8 cm H2O.
Main Methods:
- A parallel group randomized controlled trial involving 200 extremely preterm infants prior to their first extubation.
- Infants were randomized to receive either CPAP 10 cm H2O (intervention) or CPAP 7 cm H2O (control).
- The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as reintubation within 7 days of extubation.
Main Results:
- The study is registered (ACTRN12618001638224) and is currently in the pre-results phase.
- Statistical analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, adjusted for gestational age and study center.
Conclusions:
- The findings will inform optimal non-invasive respiratory support strategies for extremely preterm infants post-extubation.
- This research aims to reduce the incidence of extubation failure and associated complications like bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Introduction:
Respiratory distress syndrome is a complication of prematurity and extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks' gestation often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In this high-risk population, mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury and contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Therefore, clinicians attempt to extubate infants as quickly and use non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to facilitate the transition. However, approximately 60% of extremely preterm infants experience 'extubation failure' and require reintubation. While CPAP pressures of 5-8 cm H2O are commonly used, the optimal CPAP pressure is unknown, and higher pressures may be beneficial in avoiding extubation failure. Our trial is the Extubation CPAP Level Assessment Trial (ÉCLAT). The aim of this trial is to compare higher CPAP pressures 9-11 cm H2O with a current standard pressures of 6-8 cmH2O on extubation failure in extremely preterm infants.
Methods And Analysis:
200 extremely preterm infants will be recruited prior to their first extubation from mechanical ventilation to CPAP. This is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Infants will be randomised to one of two set CPAP pressures: CPAP 10 cmH2O (intervention) or CPAP 7 cmH2O (control). The primary outcome will be extubation failure (reintubation) within 7 days. Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials on an intention to treat basis. For the primary outcome, this will be by intention to treat, adjusted for the prerandomisation strata (GA and centre). We will use the appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethics approval has been granted by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committees. Amendments to the trial protocol will be submitted for approval. The findings of this study will be written into a clinical trial report manuscript and disseminated via peer-reviewed journals (on-line or in press) and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12618001638224; pre-results.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
04:53Author Spotlight: Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sleep Disorders in Acute COPD — A Safe, Cost-Effective Approach
Published on: October 18, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....