Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
13.6K
Food availability and long-term predation risk interactively affect antipredator response.
Shotaro Shiratsuru1, Yasmine N Majchrzak1, Michael J L Peers1
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Ecology
|June 24, 2021
Summary
Food availability and predation risk interact to shape snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) anti-predator behavior. Supplemental food altered responses based on long-term predation risk levels.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Behavioral Ecology
- Wildlife Science
Background:
- Antipredator responses are crucial for prey survival, influenced by factors like food availability and predation risk.
- The interplay between food resources and varying predation pressure on anti-predator behavior is understudied in wild populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how food availability and long-term predation risk influence the anti-predator responses of snowshoe hares to acute predation risk.
- To understand the interactive effects of food supplementation and predation risk on foraging behavior.
Main Methods:
- Monitoring free-ranging snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) in Yukon, Canada, over four winters.
- Assessing foraging responses to Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) encounters under varying food availability (supplemental feeding) and long-term predation risk (hare mortality rates).
Main Results:
- Snowshoe hares significantly reduced foraging time after lynx encounters, with stronger responses at closer distances.
- Food-supplemented hares showed a reduced anti-predator response under high long-term risk, unlike control hares who increased their response.
- The magnitude of anti-predator behavior was significantly influenced by the interaction between food supplementation and long-term predation risk.
Conclusions:
- Food availability and long-term predation risk interact to modulate reactive anti-predator responses to immediate threats.
- Understanding these interacting factors is vital for predicting predator-prey dynamics and their indirect effects on prey populations.
Keywords:
Lepus americanusLynx canadensisantipredator responsefood availabilitynonconsumptive effectpredation riskpredator-preyMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
19.8K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
19.8K
Optimal Foraging
12.7K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
12.7K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.5K
Symbiosis
35.2K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
35.2K
Types of Selection
42.9K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
42.9K
Competition
23.0K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
23.0K

