Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
ATR Inhibition Induces CDK1-SPOP Signaling and Enhances Anti-PD-L1 Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer
Zhe Tang1, Patrick G Pilié1, Chuandong Geng1
1Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Purpose:
Despite significant benefit for other cancer subtypes, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has not yet been shown to significantly improve outcomes for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Prior data have shown that DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency, via genetic alteration and/or pharmacologic induction using DDR inhibitors (DDRi), may improve ICB response in solid tumors in part due to induction of mitotic catastrophe and innate immune activation. Discerning the underlying mechanisms of this DDRi-ICB interaction in a prostate cancer-specific manner is vital to guide novel clinical trials and provide durable clinical responses for men with CRPC.
Experimental Design:
We treated prostate cancer cell lines with potent, specific inhibitors of ATR kinase, as well as with PARP inhibitor, olaparib. We performed analyses of cGAS-STING and DDR signaling in treated cells, and treated a syngeneic androgen-indifferent, prostate cancer model with combined ATR inhibition and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), and performed single-cell RNA sequencing analysis in treated tumors.
Results:
ATR inhibitor (ATRi; BAY1895433) directly repressed ATR-CHK1 signaling, activated CDK1-SPOP axis, leading to destabilization of PD-L1 protein. These effects of ATRi are distinct from those of olaparib, and resulted in a cGAS-STING-initiated, IFN-β-mediated, autocrine, apoptotic response in CRPC. The combination of ATRi with anti-PD-L1 therapy resulted in robust innate immune activation and a synergistic, T-cell-dependent therapeutic response in our syngeneic mouse model.
Conclusions:
This work provides a molecular mechanistic rationale for combining ATR-targeted agents with immune checkpoint blockade for patients with CRPC. Multiple early-phase clinical trials of this combination are underway.
Insights
Combining ATR inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade shows promise for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This approach activates innate immunity and T-cell responses, offering a new strategy for CRPC treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) offers limited benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
- DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency may enhance ICB efficacy in other cancers by promoting immune activation.
- Understanding DDR-ICB interactions in CRPC is crucial for developing effective treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the molecular mechanisms of combining DDR inhibitors with ICB in CRPC.
- To evaluate the therapeutic potential of ATR inhibition combined with anti-PD-L1 therapy in a preclinical CRPC model.
Main Methods:
- Prostate cancer cell lines were treated with ATR inhibitors and olaparib.
- Analysis of cGAS-STING and DDR signaling pathways was performed.
- A syngeneic prostate cancer model was treated with combined ATR inhibition and anti-PD-L1, followed by single-cell RNA sequencing.
Main Results:
- ATR inhibition (ATRi) repressed ATR-CHK1 signaling and destabilized PD-L1 protein.
- ATRi induced a cGAS-STING-dependent, IFN-β-mediated apoptotic response in CRPC cells.
- Combination therapy demonstrated robust innate immune activation and synergistic, T-cell-dependent tumor response in mice.
Conclusions:
- This study provides a molecular rationale for combining ATR inhibitors with ICB in CRPC.
- The findings support ongoing clinical trials investigating this combination therapy for CRPC patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
Abnormal Proliferation
Negative Regulator Molecules
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway

