Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Combined Supine and Standing Imaging for Varicocele: An Improved Diagnostic Approach
Published on: November 22, 2024
Quality Assessment and Relevant Clinical Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials of Varicocele: Next Step to
Kyu Shik Kim1, Jae Hoon Chung2, Hyung Joon Park3
1Department of Urology, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Quality of randomized controlled trials on varicocele has improved over time, with increasing Institutional Review Board approval and funding. Surgical treatments remain common, though methodological limitations persist.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Varicocele, a common cause of male infertility, is often treated surgically.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for evaluating treatment efficacy.
- Assessing the methodological quality of varicocele RCTs is essential for reliable evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning varicocele treatments.
- To analyze trends in RCT quality from 1979 to 2017.
- To identify factors influencing the quality of varicocele research.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search for varicocele RCTs published between 1979 and 2017.
- Quality assessment using Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
- Analysis of quality trends, funding sources, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and intervention details.
Main Results:
- RCT quality, measured by Jadad and van Tulder scores, significantly improved from 1979 to 2017.
- Funded RCTs and those with IRB approval demonstrated higher quality.
- While blinding and allocation concealment improved, allocation concealment showed a notable decline in recent years.
Conclusions:
- The quantity and quality of varicocele RCTs have increased between 1979 and 2017.
- Improvements in quality are linked to increased IRB approval, funding, and multicenter participation.
- Despite methodological challenges, surgical treatment RCTs show evolving quality standards.
Purpose:
To assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on varicocele published from 1979 to 2017.
Materials And Methods:
We searched for original RCT on varicocele published between 1979 and 2017. Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool were used to analyze RCT quality over time. Effects on RCT quality including funding source, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and intervention were assessed. Treatment parameters of varicocele were also analyzed.
Results:
Blinding and allocation concealment were described in 25.9% and 9.4% of RCT, respectively. Both tended to increase and a sharp dip in allocation concealment was observed in 2010-2017. Jadad scores increased steadily from 1979 to 2017 (1.28±0.59 to 2.19±1.10, p<0.01). Van Tulder scores tended to increase from 1979 to 2017 (4.21±0.94 to 5.58±1.58, p<0.01). RCTs with funding statements had higher Jadad (Yes vs. No, 3.25±0.50 vs. 1.70±0.97; p<0.01) and van Tulder (Yes vs. No, 7.25±1.26 vs. 4.81±1.26; p<0.01) scores than unfunded RCTs. IRB approval and intervention were associated with better quality.
Conclusions:
The number of RCTs on varicocele increased from 1979 to 2017. Also, quality improved over time with increasing IRB approval, funding, and multicenter trial. Most RCTs on varicocele reported the use of surgical treatment. RCTs of surgical treatments have limitations to satisfy the condition of RCT to conduct, but their quality has improved over time.
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding

