Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.1K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

767
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
767

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the validity of situation awareness measures through visual behaviours in car driving: A comprehensive review.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Manipulable but not semantic distractors disrupt the selection of mechanically alternative tools.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Growing Technological Opacity and the Social Brain.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Toward a cognitive neuroscience of technology.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Correction: Left area PF as a neural marker of technical reasoning.

Brain structure & function·2026
Same author

Human-Technology Symbiosis at work: a brain morphometric investigation of inter-individual differences in smart-tool proneness.

Ergonomics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.5K

Tool acceptance and acceptability: insights from a real tool use activity.

Boris Alexandre1, François Osiurak1,2, Jordan Navarro1,2

  • 1Laboratoire D'Etude Des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EA 3082), Université de Lyon, Bron, France.

Cognitive Processing
|June 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Tool adoption hinges on both initial intention (acceptability) and actual use (acceptance). While ease of use guides initial judgment, utility becomes paramount for sustained tool engagement and preference over time.

Keywords:
AcceptabilityAcceptanceTechnologyTool behavior

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.5K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Tool adoption research often separates intention (acceptability) from actual use (acceptance).
  • Behavioral observations are underutilized in understanding user tool engagement.
  • Existing criteria for tool acceptance lack a clear hierarchical understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between tool acceptability and acceptance.
  • To determine the hierarchical influence of criteria (ease of use, utility, aesthetics) on tool adoption.
  • To explore how prior exposure and usage duration affect user judgment and tool preference.

Main Methods:

  • Participants evaluated xylophones based on ease of use, utility, and aesthetics.
  • Acceptability was assessed via questionnaires and video observation after short-term exposure (Experiment 1).
  • Acceptance was measured after five long-term xylophone learning sessions (Experiment 2).

Main Results:

  • Prior tool exposure significantly altered user judgment, distinguishing acceptability from acceptance.
  • A clear hierarchy of criteria emerged: ease of use dominated initial judgments, while utility became key for long-term acceptance.
  • Differences were observed between tool observation and actual tool use, and between short-term and long-term engagement.

Conclusions:

  • Tool acceptability and acceptance are distinct constructs influenced by usage context and duration.
  • Ease of use is critical for initial impressions, but utility drives sustained engagement and preference.
  • Understanding the dynamic hierarchy of adoption criteria is essential for effective tool design and implementation.