Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.5K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

41.8K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
41.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.3K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.3K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.5K
2.5K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

6.8K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Health of Nations Fund: Financing global drug development.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Estimating the global inventory of deprioritized clinical-stage drug development programs: Toward a market for shelved assets.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same author

Establishing a commercial solution for extremely rare genetic diseases.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

Genetic Targets, Financial Creativity: BridgeBio's Model for Sustainable Drug Development.

Drug discovery today·2025
Same author

Use of Bayesian decision analysis in the design of patient-centered clinical trials for kidney failure devices.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

The evolution of discrimination under finite memory constraints.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 1, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K

The origin of cooperation.

Nihal Koduri1, Andrew W Lo2,3

  • 1Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; nihal.koduri@sloan.mit.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|June 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Evolutionary models show that dominant behaviors maximize offspring and minimize correlation between types, explaining cooperation. This evolutionary strategy drives correlation towards -1.

Keywords:
cooperationcorrelationevolutioninteractionmodel

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 1, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Population dynamics
  • Game theory

Background:

  • Interacting populations face random environmental conditions.
  • Understanding the evolution of cooperation is a key challenge in evolutionary biology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct an evolutionary model of interacting populations.
  • To investigate the relationship between reproductive success and behavioral strategies.
  • To explain the evolution of cooperation using correlation dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an evolutionary model for two interacting types of individuals.
  • Analysis of reproductive success under random environmental conditions.
  • Mathematical modeling of offspring number correlation.

Main Results:

  • Evolutionarily dominant behaviors maximize individual offspring.
  • Dominant behaviors minimize the correlation between offspring numbers of different types.
  • Correlation is driven towards -1, indicating negative covariance.

Conclusions:

  • Minimizing offspring correlation is a key evolutionary outcome.
  • Correlation dynamics provide a framework for understanding the evolution of cooperation.
  • The model offers insights into social behavior in variable environments.