Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Home-Based Prescribed Pulmonary Exercise in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 24, 2019
Prognostic utility of various multidimensional grading scales among Saudi patients with bronchiectasis
Abdullah Al-Harbi1, Majed Al-Ghamdi1, Abdelmonim Abdulrahman1
1College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Introduction:
A number of multidimensional scoring systems, including the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI), the FACED score, and the Exacerbation-FACED (Exa-FACED, a derivative of FACED), have been proposed and validated to assess the severity and prognosis in patients with bronchiectasis. Although these metrics have been validated through large multicenter efforts in Europe and Latin America, there have been no attempts at external validation in other populations.
Ojectives:
The aim of this study was to validate specific multidimensional grading scales (BSI, FACED, and Exa-FACED) in predicting mortality, future exacerbations, and hospitalizations among Saudi patients with bronchiectasis.
Methods:
A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care centre. The three multidimensional grading scales (BSI, FACED, and Exa-FACED) were calculated for each patient. Future frequent acute exacerbations (≥2/year) and severe acute exacerbations leading to hospitalization were recorded for 1 year, and all-cause mortality was monitored for up to 5 years.
Results:
A total of 301 patients with bronchiectasis (mean age of 60±17 years and 66% female) were include. All Grading scales performed well in predicting 5-year survival. Area under the curve (AUC) values for BSI (0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90), FACED (0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.85), and Ex-FACED (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87). The BSI (AUC=0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) performed better than FACED scoring (AUC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.81; P<0.0001) in predicting hospitalization. Exa-FACED scoring (AUC=0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88) improved upon FACED scores in predicting hospitalization. The BSI (AUC=0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.97) fared significantly better than FACED scoring (AUC=0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.80; p<0.0001) in predicting frequent acute exacerbations (≥2/year). Again, Exa-FACED scoring (AUC=0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.89) improved upon FACED scores in predicting frequent acute exacerbations (≥2/year).
Conclusions:
All scoring systems performed adequately in 5-year mortality projections. Although Exa-FACED scoring improved upon FACED scores in predicting forthcoming frequent acute exacerbations and hospitalization, the BSI outperformed both in this regard.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation

