Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial
Hao Z Wong1, Maarten Brusseleers2, Kelly A Hall3
1Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to determine the response rate to a mixed-mode survey using email compared with that to a paper survey in survivors of critical illness.
Design:
This is a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
The study was conducted at a single-centre quaternary intensive care unit (ICU) in Adelaide, Australia.
Participants:
Study participants were patients admitted to the ICU for ≥48 h and discharged from the hospital.
Interventions:
The participants were randomised to receive a survey by paper (via mail) or via online (via email, or if a non-email user, via a letter with a website address). Patients who did not respond to the initial survey received a reminder paper survey after 14 days. The survey included quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and post-traumatic symptom (Impact of Event Scale-Revised) assessment.
Main Outcome Measures:
Survey response rate, extent of survey completion, clinical outcomes at different time points after discharge, and survey cost analysis were the main outcome measures. Outcomes were stratified based on follow-up time after ICU discharge (3, 6, and 12 months).
Results:
A total of 239 patients were randomised. The response rate was similar between the groups (mixed-mode: 78% [92/118 patients] vs. paper: 80% [97/121 patients], p = 0.751) and did not differ between time points of follow-up. Incomplete surveys were more prevalent in the paper group (10% vs 18%). The median EuroQol-5D-5L index value was 0.83 [0.71-0.92]. Depressive symptoms were reported by 25% of patients (46/187), anxiety symptoms were reported by 27% (50/187), and probable post-traumatic stress disorder was reported by 14% (25/184). Patient outcomes did not differ between the groups or time points of follow-up. The cost per reply was AU$ 16.60 (mixed-mode) vs AU$ 19.78 (paper).
Conclusion:
The response rate of a mixed-mode survey is similar to that of a paper survey and may provide modest cost savings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Blind Procedures
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

