Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.1K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

673
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
673
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

683
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
683
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

844
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
844
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

40.2K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
40.2K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

7.9K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal Inference Over a Subpopulation: The Effect of Malaria Vaccine in Women During Pregnancy.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

A mixture distribution approach for assessing genetic impact from twin study.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

Generalizability of causal inference in observational studies under retrospective convenience sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2018
Same author

Safety and pharmacokinetics of the Fc-modified HIV-1 human monoclonal antibody VRC01LS: A Phase 1 open-label clinical trial in healthy adults.

PLoS medicine·2018
Same author

Semiparametric pseudoscore for regression with multidimensional but incompletely observed regressor.

Statistics in medicine·2017
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K

Assessing conditional causal effect via characteristic score.

Zonghui Hu1

  • 1Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to estimate conditional causal effects, identifying key patient characteristics that predict treatment benefits. This helps pinpoint subpopulations who benefit most from interventions.

Keywords:
causal inferenceconditional causal effectdimension reductionhigh dimensionalitynonparametric regressionsparse dimension reduction

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Statistical modeling
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Observational studies involve diverse populations, making treatment effect estimation complex.
  • Estimating conditional causal effects (treatment effects based on patient characteristics) is crucial but challenging.
  • Challenges include individual-level unobservability of causal effects and high-dimensional baseline variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a nonparametric estimation procedure for conditional causal effects.
  • To identify key baseline variables influencing treatment benefits.
  • To develop a 'characteristic score' for predicting treatment effects and identifying beneficiary subpopulations.

Main Methods:

  • A nonparametric estimation procedure using a pseudo-response is developed.
  • Sparse dimension reduction and variable prescreening are employed.
  • The method estimates a 'characteristic score' representing baseline variable influence on treatment benefit.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively estimates conditional treatment effects.
  • Key baseline variables impacting treatment benefit are identified.
  • The 'characteristic score' successfully predicts treatment effects and identifies specific patient subgroups.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method offers a parsimonious approach to estimating conditional causal effects.
  • It facilitates the identification of subpopulations who are most likely to benefit from a treatment.
  • Applied to an HIV study, it aids in assessing antiretroviral regimen benefits and identifying beneficiaries.