Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

878
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
878

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Infection prevention and control measures for Ebola and Marburg disease: a series of rapid reviews.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Development of a target product profile for artificial intelligence in diabetic eye screening in England: a modified Delphi consensus study.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

Generative AI-enabled clinical decision support system in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Missing infrastructure for real-world predictive AI impact.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Risk of cardiovascular events and death following retinal arterial occlusion and transient monocular visual loss.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

470

Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI

Viknesh Sounderajah1,2, Hutan Ashrafian3,2, Robert M Golub4

  • 1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Paddington, UK.

BMJ Open
|June 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We are developing STARD-AI, a checklist for reporting artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic accuracy studies. This ensures transparent and complete reporting of AI in healthcare.

Keywords:
health informaticsprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

More Related Videos

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

813
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

612

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

470
Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

813
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

612

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Services Research
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) checklist enhances reporting quality for diagnostic tests.
  • Current STARD guidelines do not adequately address the unique challenges of AI-driven diagnostic interventions.
  • There is a need for specific reporting standards for AI in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a new reporting guideline, STARD-AI, tailored for diagnostic accuracy studies involving artificial intelligence.
  • To improve the completeness and transparency of reporting for AI-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Main Methods:

  • A six-stage development process is being employed for STARD-AI.
  • This includes project organization, item generation via literature review and expert surveys, and a modified Delphi consensus methodology.
  • The process also involves drafting, piloting with expert users, and developing an explanation and elaboration document.

Main Results:

  • The STARD-AI checklist development is in progress, utilizing a rigorous consensus-based approach.
  • Ethical approval has been obtained, and a dissemination strategy targeting multiple stakeholders is planned.
  • The development process involves expert consensus, piloting, and aims for widespread adoption.

Conclusions:

  • STARD-AI will provide essential guidance for reporting AI diagnostic accuracy studies.
  • This new checklist aims to enhance transparency and completeness in a rapidly evolving field.
  • Effective dissemination will be crucial for the adoption and impact of STARD-AI.