Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

09:22
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
Published on: February 28, 2021
5.7K
Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning
Luke W Koblan1,2,3, Mandana Arbab1,2,3, Max W Shen1,2,3,4
1Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nature Biotechnology
|June 29, 2021
Summary
Engineered programmable cytosine-guanine to guanine-cytosine (C•G-to-G•C) base editors and machine learning models improve editing efficiency and purity. This advance enables precise correction of disease-related genetic variants with high accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Bioengineering
Background:
- Programmable cytosine-guanine to guanine-cytosine (C•G-to-G•C) base editors (CGBEs) offer significant scientific and therapeutic promise.
- However, predicting C•G-to-G•C editing outcomes and achieving high efficiency and purity remain challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop engineered CGBEs and machine learning models for efficient and high-purity C•G-to-G•C base editing.
- To identify factors influencing C•G-to-G•C editing through a CRISPR interference screen.
Main Methods:
- A CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) screen targeting DNA repair genes was conducted.
- Ten engineered CGBEs were characterized across 10,638 genomic sites in mammalian cells.
- Machine learning models were trained to predict editing purity and yield.
Main Results:
- Machine learning models accurately predicted editing outcomes (R=0.90).
- Engineered CGBEs achieved >90% precision (mean 96%) and up to 70% efficiency (mean 14%) for disease-related variants.
- Computational prediction enabled high-purity editing at over fourfold more sites compared to single CGBE variants.
Conclusions:
- The developed CGBE suite and predictive models significantly enhance C•G-to-G•C base editing efficiency and precision.
- This approach facilitates the correction of numerous disease-related genetic variants.
- Optimized CGBE-single-guide RNA pairing expands the scope of precise base editing applications.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR and crRNAs
18.0K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
18.0K
CRISPR
53.9K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
53.9K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
760
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
760

