Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
[Conventional grading vs. molecular grading : Decision aids for clinical routine]
C Kakies1, D Louise Dräger2, P Spiess3
1ZEMODIAG, Zentrum für morphologische Diagnostik Leipzig, Muldentalstraße 66, 04288, Leipzig, Deutschland. c.kakies@zemodiag.de.
Abstract:
Conventional histopathological grading of a cancer is of utmost importance for the management and prognosis of the patient. Histopathological grading is predominantly a function of the differentiation and proliferation of tumor cells, the amount of necrosis present and the pattern of invasion. In addition, the molecular set-up of a given cancer which can be determined to some degree by immunohistochemistry or by methods analyzing genetic and epigenetic alterations can be used in some instances to improve the information gained by conventional histopathologic grading. Indeed, this latter option implies the promise of individualized tumor therapy. While this promise is on the horizon, the clinical implications for penile cancer are not yet transferable to individualized penile cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves
Karyotyping

