Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Douglas Altman's 2009 Grand Lecture: Can we trust our literature?
J Raymond1, O Naggara2, F Guilbert1
1Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology service, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Medical literature faces significant issues like study design errors and publication bias, where positive results are favored over negative ones. This leads to overestimating treatment effectiveness and requires improved reporting standards for accurate scientific understanding.
Area of Science:
- Medical research integrity
- Scientific publishing standards
Background:
- Medical literature exhibits frequent errors in study design, methodology, and interpretation.
- Publication bias, favoring positive results, leads to overestimation of treatment and diagnostic study values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight critical issues in medical literature.
- To emphasize the impact of publication bias and selective reporting.
- To advocate for improved reporting standards.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of recent studies in medical literature.
- Identification of common errors and biases.
- Review of reporting practices and their consequences.
Main Results:
- Significant problems identified in study design, methods, and interpretation.
- Publication bias and selective reporting are prevalent, skewing results.
- Even primary endpoints are sometimes altered in published articles compared to protocols.
Conclusions:
- The peer-review process is insufficient to address unreported data.
- Better reporting is crucial for mitigating these issues.
- Progress in transparent reporting initiatives is slow, necessitating urgent action.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Social Proof
Social Traps
Language and Cognition
Magical Thinking
